Temporal landmarks: proximity prevails

Subjects in conditioning experiments time their conditioned responses relative to the onsets of the conditioned stimuli (CSs). These onsets are temporal landmarks, by reference to which subjects may estimate the location of the unconditioned stimulus (US) in time. In a serial compound conditioning paradigm, a long duration CS comes on first, followed later by a second shorter CS, creating both a long-range and a short-range predictor of the US. We ask whether displacing the short-range predictor relative to the long-range predictor causes subjects to strike a compromise between the different temporal locations predicted by the two CSs. In three experiments with pigeons, we varied the training conditions so as to favor or militate against this outcome. However, in all conditions, there was no compromise; after the onset of the displaced short-range CS, the timing of conditioned responding was governed by it alone. This result contrasts with the compromises that are seen when the feeding time predicted by a CS is put in conflict with the time predicted by the circadian clock, and with the similar compromises sometimes seen when a nearby spatial landmark is displaced relative to a larger spatial context.

[1]  J. Gibbon Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[2]  P. Holland Temporal determinants of occasion setting in feature-positive discriminations , 1986 .

[3]  P R Killeen,et al.  Optimal timing and the Weber function. , 1987, Psychological review.

[4]  K. Cheng The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. , 1989 .

[5]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[6]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  The Role of Time in Elementary Associations , 1993 .

[7]  Ralph E. Mistlberger,et al.  Circadian food-anticipatory activity: Formal models and physiological mechanisms , 1994, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  Zhang,et al.  Visually mediated odometry in honeybees , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  P. Holland,et al.  Temporal specificity in serial feature-positive discrimination learning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  John Gibbon,et al.  Chapter 8 Cooperation, conflict and compromise between circadian and interval clocks in pigeons , 1997 .

[11]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[12]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[13]  C. Gallistel Frequency, Contingency and the Information Processing Theory of Conditioning , 2002 .

[14]  Thomas S Collett,et al.  The use of landmarks and panoramic context in the performance of local vectors by navigating honeybees. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.