Test-Retest Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV)

The test-retest reliability of the Spanish Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV) is presented. This version was developed in Puerto Rico in consultation with an international bilingual committee, sponsored by NIMH. The sample (N = 146) consisted of children recruited from outpatient mental health clinics and a drug residential treatment facility. Two different pairs of nonclinicians administered the DISC twice to the parent and child respondents. Results indicated fair to moderate agreement for parent reports on most diagnoses. Relatively similar agreement levels were observed for last month and last year time frames. Surprisingly, the inclusion of impairment as a criterion for diagnosis did not substantially change the pattern of results for specific disorders. Parents were more reliable when reporting on diagnoses of younger (4–10) than older children. Children 11–17 years old were reliable informants on disruptive and substance abuse/dependence disorders, but unreliable for anxiety and depressive disorders. Hence, parents were more reliable when reporting about anxiety and depressive disorders whereas children were more reliable than their parents when reporting about disruptive and substance disorders.

[1]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  A. Farmer,et al.  A comparison of clinical and diagnostic interview schedule diagnoses. Physician reexamination of lay-interviewed cases in the general population. , 1985, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  A. Costello,et al.  Age differences in the reliability of the psychiatric interview of the child. , 1985, Child development.

[4]  J. G. Young,et al.  Structured diagnostic interviews for children and adolescents: current status and future directions. , 1987, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[5]  R. Loeber,et al.  Optimal informants on childhood disruptive behaviors , 1989, Development and Psychopathology.

[6]  P. Jensen,et al.  Children at risk: II. Risk factors and clinic utilization. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[7]  A Donner,et al.  A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  G. Canino,et al.  The Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) in Puerto Rico , 1993, Culture, medicine and psychiatry.

[9]  P. Szatmari,et al.  Evaluation of the diagnostic interview for children and adolescents for use in general population samples , 1993, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[10]  P. Jensen,et al.  Scales, diagnoses, and child psychopathology: I. CBCL and DISC relationships. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[11]  M Davies,et al.  The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised Version (DISC-R): I. Preparation, field testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[12]  R. Loeber,et al.  Criterion validity of informants in the diagnosis of disruptive behavior disorders in children: a preliminary study. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  Dc Washington Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed. , 1994 .

[14]  G. Canino,et al.  Test-retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1). Parent, child, and combined algorithms. , 1995, Archives of general psychiatry.

[15]  M. Weissman,et al.  The NIMH Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study: background and methodology. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[16]  P. Shrout,et al.  The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-2.1) in Spanish: reliability in a Hispanic population. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[17]  G. Canino,et al.  Criterion validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[18]  P. Shrout Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry , 1998, Statistical methods in medical research.

[19]  M. Rubio‐Stipec,et al.  Informant-Based Determinants of Symptom Attenuation in Structured Child Psychiatric Interviews , 1999, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[20]  G. Canino,et al.  Parent and child contributions to diagnosis of mental disorder: are both informants always necessary? , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[21]  D. Shaffer,et al.  NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[22]  C. Hoven,et al.  How specific is specific impairment? , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.