Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.

The advent of three-dimensional (3D) imaging technology has caused a significant change in the diagnostic approach practiced in dentistry, and in particular, orthodontics. Although conventional imaging methods such as orthopantomography and lateral cephalometric and anteroposterior graphs provide sufficient information in mild to moderate orthodontic anomalies, 3D imaging can be a necessity in severe skeletal anomalies or tooth impactions. Computed tomography (CT) has been frequently used when detailed 3D imaging is necessary despite its relatively high cost, low vertical resolution, and high dose of radiation. In contrast to conventional CT application, the development of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) technology has had important advantages over the conventional method, such as minimization of the radiation dose, image accuracy, rapid scan time, fewer image artifacts, chair-side image display, and real-time analysis. These advantages have provided dental practitioners the opportunity to benefit more frequently from 3D imaging by relatively diminishing radiation dose considerations, financial burden, and availability, in particular. Therefore, the aim of this review is to highlight the current understanding of CBCT practice in orthodontics and to summarize clinically relevant conditions.

[1]  James Mah,et al.  Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  C. Hildebolt,et al.  Dental x‐rays and risk of meningioma , 2013, Cancer.

[3]  Icrp 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1991 .

[4]  B. Larson Cone-beam computed tomography is the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. , 2014, Northwest dentistry.

[5]  Dennis G. Fryback,et al.  The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  D L Gander,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics , 2002 .

[7]  Stuart C. White,et al.  Patient Image Selection Criteria for Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging , 2009 .

[8]  Snehlata Oberoi,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of impacted canines and root resorption using cone beam computed tomography. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[9]  Lysle E. Johnston A Few Comments on an Elegant Answer in Search of Useful Questions , 2011 .

[10]  E. Hosseini Cone beam CT applications in orthodontics , 2016 .

[11]  Allan G Farman,et al.  Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  Nicholas Drage,et al.  Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontic Patients , 2013, Journal of orthodontics.

[13]  David C Hatcher,et al.  Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  S C White,et al.  Contribution of pretreatment radiographs to orthodontists' decision making. , 1991, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[15]  S. Kapila,et al.  Efficacy of identifying maxillofacial lesions in cone-beam computed tomographs by orthodontists and orthodontic residents with third-party software. , 2012, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. [corrected]. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[17]  Stuart C White,et al.  Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  Koutaro Maki,et al.  Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  A. Farman,et al.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. , 2006, Journal.

[20]  S A Stratemann,et al.  Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. , 2008, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[21]  André Mol,et al.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[22]  Danielle R. Periago,et al.  Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[23]  G. Willems,et al.  Root resorption of the maxillary lateral incisor caused by impacted canine: a literature review , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[24]  HyeRan Choo,et al.  Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[25]  M. Ivanovic,et al.  Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[26]  M. FrazÃo,et al.  The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[27]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Evaluating the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[28]  S. Kapila,et al.  The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[29]  Ulrich Wolf,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  Max Heiland,et al.  Value of Two Cone-beam Computed Tomography Systems from an Orthodontic Point of View , 2007, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[31]  Nicholas Drage,et al.  Incidental findings arising with cone beam computed tomography imaging of the orthodontic patient. , 2011, The Angle orthodontist.

[32]  K Horner,et al.  Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[33]  M M Bornstein,et al.  Incidental maxillary sinus findings in orthodontic patients: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). , 2011, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[34]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  A. Farman,et al.  Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. , 2012, Australian dental journal.

[36]  C. Hildebolt,et al.  American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.