An investigation of motion correction algorithms for pediatric spinal cord DTI in healthy subjects and patients with spinal cord injury.

Patient and physiological motion can cause artifacts in DTI of the spinal cord which can impact image quality and diffusion indices. The purpose of this investigation was to determine a reliable motion correction method for pediatric spinal cord DTI and show effects of motion correction on DTI parameters in healthy subjects and patients with spinal cord injury. Ten healthy subjects and ten subjects with spinal cord injury were scanned using a 3T scanner. Images were acquired with an inner field-of-view DTI sequence covering cervical spine levels C1 to C7. Images were corrected for motion using two types of transformation (rigid and affine) and three cost functions. Corrected images and transformations were examined qualitatively and quantitatively using in-house developed code. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) indices were calculated and tested for statistical significance pre- and post- motion correction. Images corrected using rigid methods showed improvements in image quality, while affine methods frequently showed residual distortions in corrected images. Blinded evaluation of pre and post correction images showed significant improvement in cord homogeneity and edge conspicuity in corrected images (p<0.0001). The average FA changes were statistically significant (p<0.0001) in the spinal cord injury group, while healthy subjects showed less FA change and were not significant. In both healthy subjects and subjects with spinal cord injury, quantitative and qualitative analysis showed the rigid scaled-least-squares registration technique to be the most reliable and effective in improving image quality.

[1]  P. Stroman,et al.  Investigation of human cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord motion: Implications for imaging spinal cord structure and function , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  U Klose,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid flow , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[3]  P. Basser,et al.  Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion‐weighted MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Renata Longo,et al.  Dependence of the fractional anisotropy in cervical spine from the number of diffusion gradients, repeated acquisition and voxel size. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  U. Klose,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid flow , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[6]  Won-Jin Moon,et al.  How does distortion correction correlate with anisotropic indices? A diffusion tensor imaging study. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  J. Cohen-Adad,et al.  Demyelination and degeneration in the injured human spinal cord detected with diffusion and magnetization transfer MRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Devivo,et al.  Epidemiology of Spinal Cord Injury In Chiloren And Adolescents , 2004, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[9]  G. Barker,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis , 1999, Neurology.

[10]  M. Mulcahey,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Normal Pediatric Spinal Cord Using an Inner Field of View Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  J. Rubin,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasonic evaluation of spinal cord motion. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  L. Schad,et al.  Reproducible evaluation of spinal cord DTI using an optimized inner volume sequence in combination with probabilistic ROI analysis. , 2009, Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik.

[13]  Tarun Saxena,et al.  Mechanical characterization of the injured spinal cord after lateral spinal hemisection injury in the rat. , 2012, Journal of neurotrauma.

[14]  J. Finsterbusch.  High‐resolution diffusion tensor imaging with inner field‐of‐view EPI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  Walter H Backes,et al.  Assessing and minimizing the effects of noise and motion in clinical DTI at 3 T , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[17]  A. Anderson,et al.  Effects of cord motion on diffusion imaging of the spinal cord , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Correction of susceptibility artifacts in diffusion tensor data using non-linear registration , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[21]  Patrick W. Stroman,et al.  Spatial normalization, bulk motion correction and coregistration for functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human cervical spinal cord and brainstem. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  Xiaoping P. Hu,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging reveals regional differences in the cervical spinal cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[23]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  The impact of post-processing on spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging , 2013, NeuroImage.

[24]  Giovanni Giulietti,et al.  Issues about the fMRI of the human spinal cord. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  Thierry Metens,et al.  A Monte Carlo simulation of image misalignment effects in diffusion tensor imaging. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  Hangyi Jiang,et al.  DtiStudio: Resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[27]  A. Mayer,et al.  Head injury or head motion? Assessment and quantification of motion artifacts in diffusion tensor imaging studies , 2012, Human brain mapping.