Isolation and identification of Dichelobacter nodosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum using the polymerase chain reaction method in sheep with footrot

Footrot is an important infectious disease of small ruminants leading to severe economical losses. The aim of the present study was to determine isolation and identification rates of Dichelobacter nodosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum in the culture techniques and reveal the specificity and sensitivity of the culture technique based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method in sheep with footrot. Dry swabs and swabs with Amies medium from 83 sheep were subjected to PCR and culture analyses. In dry swabs, 4 samples were positive for F. necrophorum and all were negative for D. nodosus. Colonies in Eugon and Fusobacterium selective agars from swabs with Amies medium were evaluated. Polymerase chain reaction analysis was conducted on macroscopically and microscopically unidentified samples. The positivity rate was 55.4% for D. nodosus and 69.8% for F. necrophorum in cultures from Fusobacterium selective agars. The positivity rate for D. nodosus in Fusobacterium selective agars was higher than that in Eugon agar. Performing PCR and culture methods increased positivity as compared to performing them alone. In comparison with the PCR method, culturing in Fusobacterium selective agars had moderate sensitivity and low specificity for D. nodosus (71.7 and 28.7%) and F. necrophorum (61.3 and 80.0%), respectively. In conclusion, Fusobacterium selective agar (without antibiotics) for isolation and identification of D. nodosus is superior to Eugon agar. Fusobacterium necrophorum should also be considered as a provoking agent for footrot in small ruminants. The PCR method on culture increases elucidation of definitive aetiology. Anaerobe agents, PCR, selective medium, sensitivity, specificity

[1]  J. Egerton,et al.  A review of footrot in sheep: Aetiology, risk factors and control methods , 2013 .

[2]  A. Ewers,et al.  Outbreak-specific monovalent/bivalent vaccination to control and eradicate virulent ovine footrot. , 2013, Vaccine.

[3]  L. Dicks,et al.  Fusobacterium necrophorum, and not Dichelobacter nodosus, is associated with equine hoof thrush. , 2013, Veterinary microbiology.

[4]  S. Magray,et al.  Identification of two new serotypes within serogroup B of Dichelobacter nodosus. , 2012, Anaerobe.

[5]  S. Magray,et al.  Determination of prevalence and economic impact of ovine footrot in central Kashmir India with isolation and molecular characterization of Dichelobacter nodosus. , 2011, Anaerobe.

[6]  M. Ganter,et al.  Identification of two new Dichelobacter nodosus strains in Germany. , 2010, The Veterinary Journal.

[7]  J. Hickford,et al.  Detection of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Dichelobacter nodosus in lame cattle on dairy farms in New Zealand. , 2009, Research in veterinary science.

[8]  Huitong Zhou,et al.  The detection of Dichelobacter nodosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum from footrot lesions in New Zealand goats. , 2009, Anaerobe.

[9]  Huitong Zhou,et al.  Dichelobacter nodosus, Fusobacterium necrophorum and the epidemiology of footrot. , 2009, Anaerobe.

[10]  Huitong Zhou,et al.  Variation in Fusobacterium necrophorum strains present on the hooves of footrot infected sheep, goats and cattle. , 2009, Veterinary microbiology.

[11]  G. Stewart,et al.  Fusobacterium necrophorum: a ruminal bacterium that invades liver to cause abscesses in cattle. , 2009, Anaerobe.

[12]  J. Hickford,et al.  Characterization of footrot bacteria Dichelobacter nodosus using PCR amplification and DNA sequence analysis , 2006 .

[13]  K. Bowker,et al.  Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin against Anaerobes Studied in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model , 2005, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  L. Green,et al.  The detection and characterisation of Dichelobacter nodosus from cases of ovine footrot in England and Wales. , 2005, Veterinary microbiology.

[15]  Y. Nitzan,et al.  Inactivation of anaerobic bacteria by various photosensitized porphyrins or by hemin , 1994, Current Microbiology.

[16]  A. Sağliyan The role of copper and zinc in the etiology of foot-rot of sheep in Elazig region , 2003 .

[17]  A. Sağliyan Clinical evaluation of sheep foot diseases observed in Elazig region , 2003 .

[18]  J. Ha,et al.  Effects of Non-ionic Surfactants on Enzyme Distributions of Rumen Contents, Anaerobic Growth of Rumen Microbes, Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and Performances of Lactating Cows , 2003 .

[19]  J. Egerton,et al.  Identification and characterisation of serogroup M among Nepalese isolates of Dichelobacter nodosus, the transmitting agent of footrot in small ruminants. , 1998, Veterinary microbiology.

[20]  S. J. Billington,et al.  Comparison of gene probe and conventional methods for the differentiation of ovine footrot isolates of Dichelobacter nodosus. , 1996, Veterinary microbiology.

[21]  P. D. Claxton,et al.  Ovine footrot: clinical diagnosis and bacteriology. , 1993 .

[22]  D. Citron,et al.  New medium selective for Fusobacterium species and differential for Fusobacterium necrophorum , 1981, Journal of clinical microbiology.