Intelligence and neural efficiency: Measures of brain activation versus measures of functional connectivity in the brain

Abstract The neural efficiency hypothesis of intelligence suggests a more efficient use of the cortex (or even the brain) in brighter as compared to less intelligent individuals. This has been shown in a series of studies employing different neurophysiological measurement methods and a broad range of different cognitive task demands. However, most of the studies dealing with the brain–IQ relationship used parameters of absolute or relative brain activation such as the event-related (de-)synchronization of EEG alpha activity, allowing for interpretations in terms of more or less brain activation when individuals are confronted with cognitively demanding tasks. In order to investigate the neural efficiency hypothesis more thoroughly, we also used measures that inform us about functional connectivity between different brain areas (or functional coupling, respectively) when engaged in cognitive task performance. Analyses reveal evidence that higher intelligence is associated with a lower brain activation (or a lower ERD, respectively) and a stronger phase locking between short-distant regions of the frontal cortex.

[1]  R. Haier,et al.  The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  Bernhard Graimann,et al.  Phase coupling between different motor areas during tongue-movement imagery , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate following learning , 1992 .

[4]  Nancy C Andreasen,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[5]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study , 1992, Brain Research.

[6]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  Eileen Luders,et al.  Gender differences in cortical complexity , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  C Neuper,et al.  Intelligence and working memory systems: evidence of neural efficiency in alpha band ERD. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  M I Posner,et al.  Chronometric analysis of classification. , 1967, Psychological review.

[10]  G. D. de Courten-Myers,et al.  Gender Differences in the Human Cerebral Cortex: More Neurons in Males; More Processes in Females , 1999, Journal of child neurology.

[11]  Andreas Fink,et al.  Sensitivity of alpha band ERD to individual differences in cognition. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[12]  A. Neubauer,et al.  Intelligence and neural efficiency: The influence of task content and sex on the brain–IQ relationship , 2002 .

[13]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography , 1988 .

[14]  Vincent Schmithorst,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for disparate developmental processes underlying intelligence in boys and girls , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Aljoscha C. Neubauer,et al.  Fluid intelligence and neural efficiency: effects of task complexity and sex , 2003 .

[17]  C. Chabris,et al.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Intelligence and neural efficiency: further evidence of the influence of task content and sex on the brain-IQ relationship. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  Newell,et al.  A neural basis for general intelligence , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.