Routine changing of intravascular administration sets does not reduce colonisation or infection in central venous catheters

Objective: To determine the effect of routine intravascular administration-set changes on central venous catheter (CVC) colonization and catheter related bacteremia (CRB). Design: Prospective, randomised controlled trial Setting: 18-bed ICU in a University-affiliated, tertiary referral hospital. Participants: 404 chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine coated multi-lumen CVCs from 251 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Interventions: After ethical approval, CVCs inserted in ICU and in situ on Day 4 were randomised to have their administration-sets changed on Day 4 (n = 203) or not at all (n = 201). Fluid container and blood product administration-set use was limited to 24 hours. CVCs were removed (Day 7, not required or suspected infection), and cultured for colonization ( 15 cfu). Medical and laboratory staff were blinded. CRB was diagnosed by a blinded intensivist using strict definitions. Data was collected on; catheter life, CVC site, APACHE II score, patient age, diagnosis, hyperglycemia, hypoalbuminemia, immune status, number of fluid containers and intravenous injections, propofol, blood, TPN or lipid infusion. Results: There were 10 colonized CVCs in the set change group and 19 in the no change group. This was not a statistically significant difference on Kaplan Meier survival analysis (Effect Size = 0.09, Log Rank = 0.87, df = 1, p = 0.35). There were 3 cases of CRB per group. Logistic regression found that burns diagnosis and increased ICU stay were the only factors that significantly predicted colonization (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intravenous administration-sets can be used for 7-days. Routine administration-set changes are unnecessary before this time.

[1]  I. Wilson,et al.  Novel approach to investigate a source of microbial contamination of central venous catheters , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[2]  M. Courtney,et al.  Intravascular administration sets are accurate and in appropriate condition after 7 days of continuous use: an in vitro study. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  K. Polderman,et al.  Central venous catheter use. Part 2: infectious complications. , 2002, Intensive care medicine.

[4]  D. Maki,et al.  Nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit associated with invasive medical devices , 2001, Current infectious disease reports.

[5]  I. Raad,et al.  Optimal Frequency of Changing Intravenous Administration Sets: Is It Safe to Prolong Use Beyond 72 Hours? , 2001, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  R. Muder Frequency of Intravenous Administration Set Changes and Bacteremia: Defining the Risk , 2001, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[7]  D. Fraenkel,et al.  Can We Achieve Consensus on Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections? , 2000, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[8]  D. Pittet,et al.  Catheter-Related Infections in the ICU , 2000 .

[9]  ohn,et al.  A COMPARISON OF TWO ANTIMICROBIAL-IMPREGNATED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS , 2000 .

[10]  P. Marik,et al.  The ex vivo antimicrobial activity and colonization rate of two antimicrobial-bonded central venous catheters. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[11]  L. Jensen,et al.  Changing i.v. administration sets: is 48 versus 24 hours safe for neutropenic patients with cancer? , 1998, Oncology Nursing Forum.

[12]  J. Puyana,et al.  Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  M. Pearson Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular-Device–Related Infections , 1996, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[14]  G. Bodey,et al.  The broad-spectrum activity and efficacy of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin. , 1996, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[15]  D. Merante,et al.  A prospective study evaluating the effects of extending total parenteral nutrition line changes to 72 hours. , 1995, Journal of Intravenous Nursing.

[16]  A. J. Walters A Heideggerian hermeneutic study of the practice of critical care nurses. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[17]  F. Cerra,et al.  Value of routine pressure monitoring system changes after 72 hours of continuous use , 1994, Critical Care Medicine.

[18]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. , 1994, JAMA.

[19]  G. Bodey,et al.  Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections by Using Maximal Sterile Barrier Precautions During Insertion , 1994, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[20]  W. Knaus,et al.  Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. , 1992, Chest.

[21]  D. Cohen A replication study: analysis of bacterial contamination of intravenous administration sets in use for 72 hours. , 1989, The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association.

[22]  F. Ducharme,et al.  Incidence of infection related to arterial catheterization in children: a prospective study. , 1988, Critical care medicine.

[23]  D. Maki,et al.  Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48- vs 72-hour intervals. 72 hours is safe and cost-effective. , 1987, JAMA.

[24]  D. Snydman,et al.  Intravenous Tubing Containing Burettes Can Be Safely Changed at 72 Hour Intervals , 1987, Infection Control.

[25]  T. Højbjerg,et al.  Contamination of intravenous infusion systems--the effect of changing administration sets. , 1986, The Journal of hospital infection.

[26]  M. F. Sierra,et al.  The Relationship Between Intravenous Fluid Contamination and the Frequency of Tubing Replacement , 1985, Infection Control.

[27]  E. Jaurrieta,et al.  A randomized trial on the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. , 1985, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[28]  D. Snydman,et al.  Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48-hour intervals. , 1984, JAMA.

[29]  R. Deane,et al.  Bacterial contamination of arterial lines. A prospective study. , 1983, JAMA.

[30]  D. Maki,et al.  Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[31]  A. Buxton,et al.  Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid: effects of changing administration sets. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[32]  D. Maki,et al.  A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  D. Maki,et al.  Infection control in intravenous therapy. , 1973, Annals of internal medicine.

[34]  Nosocomial Bacteremias Associated with Intravenous Fluid Therapy , 1971 .