Routine changing of intravascular administration sets does not reduce colonisation or infection in central venous catheters
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] I. Wilson,et al. Novel approach to investigate a source of microbial contamination of central venous catheters , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
[2] M. Courtney,et al. Intravascular administration sets are accurate and in appropriate condition after 7 days of continuous use: an in vitro study. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.
[3] K. Polderman,et al. Central venous catheter use. Part 2: infectious complications. , 2002, Intensive care medicine.
[4] D. Maki,et al. Nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit associated with invasive medical devices , 2001, Current infectious disease reports.
[5] I. Raad,et al. Optimal Frequency of Changing Intravenous Administration Sets: Is It Safe to Prolong Use Beyond 72 Hours? , 2001, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.
[6] R. Muder. Frequency of Intravenous Administration Set Changes and Bacteremia: Defining the Risk , 2001, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.
[7] D. Fraenkel,et al. Can We Achieve Consensus on Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections? , 2000, Anaesthesia and intensive care.
[8] D. Pittet,et al. Catheter-Related Infections in the ICU , 2000 .
[9] ohn,et al. A COMPARISON OF TWO ANTIMICROBIAL-IMPREGNATED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS , 2000 .
[10] P. Marik,et al. The ex vivo antimicrobial activity and colonization rate of two antimicrobial-bonded central venous catheters. , 1999, Critical care medicine.
[11] L. Jensen,et al. Changing i.v. administration sets: is 48 versus 24 hours safe for neutropenic patients with cancer? , 1998, Oncology Nursing Forum.
[12] J. Puyana,et al. Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.
[13] M. Pearson. Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular-Device–Related Infections , 1996, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.
[14] G. Bodey,et al. The broad-spectrum activity and efficacy of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin. , 1996, The Journal of infectious diseases.
[15] D. Merante,et al. A prospective study evaluating the effects of extending total parenteral nutrition line changes to 72 hours. , 1995, Journal of Intravenous Nursing.
[16] A. J. Walters. A Heideggerian hermeneutic study of the practice of critical care nurses. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.
[17] F. Cerra,et al. Value of routine pressure monitoring system changes after 72 hours of continuous use , 1994, Critical Care Medicine.
[18] Didier Pittet,et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. , 1994, JAMA.
[19] G. Bodey,et al. Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections by Using Maximal Sterile Barrier Precautions During Insertion , 1994, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.
[20] W. Knaus,et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. , 1992, Chest.
[21] D. Cohen. A replication study: analysis of bacterial contamination of intravenous administration sets in use for 72 hours. , 1989, The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association.
[22] F. Ducharme,et al. Incidence of infection related to arterial catheterization in children: a prospective study. , 1988, Critical care medicine.
[23] D. Maki,et al. Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48- vs 72-hour intervals. 72 hours is safe and cost-effective. , 1987, JAMA.
[24] D. Snydman,et al. Intravenous Tubing Containing Burettes Can Be Safely Changed at 72 Hour Intervals , 1987, Infection Control.
[25] T. Højbjerg,et al. Contamination of intravenous infusion systems--the effect of changing administration sets. , 1986, The Journal of hospital infection.
[26] M. F. Sierra,et al. The Relationship Between Intravenous Fluid Contamination and the Frequency of Tubing Replacement , 1985, Infection Control.
[27] E. Jaurrieta,et al. A randomized trial on the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. , 1985, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.
[28] D. Snydman,et al. Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48-hour intervals. , 1984, JAMA.
[29] R. Deane,et al. Bacterial contamination of arterial lines. A prospective study. , 1983, JAMA.
[30] D. Maki,et al. Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.
[31] A. Buxton,et al. Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid: effects of changing administration sets. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.
[32] D. Maki,et al. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.
[33] D. Maki,et al. Infection control in intravenous therapy. , 1973, Annals of internal medicine.
[34] Nosocomial Bacteremias Associated with Intravenous Fluid Therapy , 1971 .