Feature-based attentional modulation of orientation perception in somatosensation

In a reaction time study of human tactile orientation detection the effects of spatial attention and feature-based attention were investigated. Subjects had to give speeded responses to target orientations (parallel and orthogonal to the finger axis) in a random stream of oblique tactile distractor orientations presented to their index and ring fingers. Before each block of trials, subjects received a tactile cue at one finger. By manipulating the validity of this cue with respect to its location and orientation (feature), we provided an incentive to subjects to attend spatially to the cued location and only there to the cued orientation. Subjects showed quicker responses to parallel compared to orthogonal targets, pointing to an orientation anisotropy in sensory processing. Also, faster reaction times (RTs) were observed in location-matched trials, i.e., when targets appeared on the cued finger, representing a perceptual benefit of spatial attention. Most importantly, RTs were shorter to orientations matching the cue, both at the cued and at the uncued location, documenting a global enhancement of tactile sensation by feature-based attention. This is the first report of a perceptual benefit of feature-based attention outside the spatial focus of attention in somatosensory perception. The similarity to effects of feature-based attention in visual perception supports the notion of matching attentional mechanisms across sensory domains.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Differences in spatial acuity between digits , 2001, Neurology.

[4]  G L Shulman,et al.  Selective attention in vibrotactile tasks: Detecting the presence and absence of amplitude change , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Stanley J Bolanowski,et al.  A direct comparison of exogenous and endogenous inhibition of return and selective attention mechanisms in the somatosensory system , 2005, Somatosensory & motor research.

[6]  Edward A. Essock,et al.  Superior sensitivity for tactile stimuli oriented proximally-distally on the finger : Implications for mixed class 1 and class 2 anisotropies , 1997 .

[7]  J. F. Dammann,et al.  The Representation of Stimulus Orientation in the Early Stages of Somatosensory Processing , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Eric Maris,et al.  Attentional Cues Affect Accuracy and Reaction Time via Different Cognitive and Neural Processes , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Charles Spence,et al.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[13]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[14]  E C Lechelt,et al.  Spatial Asymmetries in Tactile Discrimination of Line Orientation: A Comparison of the Sighted, Visually Impaired, and Blind , 1988, Perception.

[15]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[16]  G. Boynton,et al.  Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations , 2006, Vision Research.

[17]  K Sathian,et al.  The role of spatially selective attention in the tactile perception of texture , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  H. Buchtel,et al.  Spatial attentional shifts: Further evidence for the role of polysensory mechanisms using visual and tactile stimuli , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Carsten Nicolas Boehler,et al.  Feature‐based attention modulates direction‐selective hemodynamic activity within human MT , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[20]  S. Treue.  Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  J C Craig,et al.  The tactile perception of stimulus orientation , 2008, Somatosensory & motor research.

[22]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[23]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Feature-specific effects of selective visual attention , 1995, Vision Research.

[24]  S J Bolanowski,et al.  Mechanisms of attention in touch. , 1999, Somatosensory & motor research.

[25]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color , 2003, Vision Research.

[26]  John Duncan,et al.  The demonstration of capacity limitation , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[29]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Crossmodal links between audition and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[32]  Gregory O. Gibson,et al.  Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Attention in sense of touch , 2008 .

[34]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Structure of Receptive Fields in Primate Somatosensory Area 3b: Effects of Stimulus Scanning Direction and Orientation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Geoffrey M Boynton,et al.  Tactile hyperacuity thresholds correlate with finger maps in primary somatosensory cortex (S1). , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  J. Craig,et al.  Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity. , 1999, Somatosensory & motor research.

[38]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The attentional selection of spatial and non-spatial attributes in touch: ERP evidence for parallel and independent processes , 2004, Biological Psychology.