Exploring a Feedback-Oriented Design Process Through Curved Folding

The advancement of computational design and fabrication technologies has allowed combining physical and digital processes in architecture. Existing methods for physical-digital integration offer limited support for explorations with folded non-linear surfaces. This paper introduces a feedback-oriented design approach linking physical models with digital tools to enhance ideation processes in architecture. We employ paper as a medium for translating simple mock-up ideas to more elaborate digital design models. We explain the physical exploration, 3D scanning, digital simulation, and fabrication processes. Then, we discuss the results, observations, and limitations of this design approach.

[1]  Richard Duks Koschitz.  Computational design with curved creases : David Huffman's approach to paperfolding , 2014 .

[2]  Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al.  ReForm: Integrating Physical and Digital Design through Bidirectional Fabrication , 2015, UIST.

[3]  John P. Isaacs,et al.  Scan To BIM: The Development Of A Clear Workflow For The Incorporation Of Point Clouds Within A BIM Environment , 2015 .

[4]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Integrated Workflows: Generating Feedback Between Digital and Physical Realms , 2019, CHI.

[5]  K. Oosterhuis,et al.  File to Factory and Real Time Behavior in ONL-Architecture , 2004 .

[6]  Kostas Terzidis,et al.  Algorithmic Architecture , 2006 .

[7]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[8]  Nick Dunn,et al.  Digital Fabrication in Architecture , 2012 .

[9]  Antiopi Koronaki,et al.  Computing curved-folded tessellations through straight-folding approximation , 2015, SpringSim.

[10]  Muriel Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[11]  Vishu Bhooshan,et al.  Curve-folded form-work for cast, compressive skeletons , 2015, SpringSim.

[12]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  CopyCAD: remixing physical objects with copy and paste from the real world , 2010, UIST '10.

[13]  Wei Xie,et al.  Garden: A Mixed Reality Experience Combining Virtual Reality and 3D Reconstruction , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Jan Knippers,et al.  Design and construction principles in nature and architecture. , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[15]  Samuel B. Williams,et al.  ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY , 2000 .

[16]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  The makers' movement and FabLabs in education: experiences, technologies, and research , 2013, IDC.

[17]  Ute Hoffmann,et al.  The Eyes of the Skin , 2024 .

[18]  A. Papadakēs,et al.  Folding in Architecture , 1993 .

[19]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  Interactive fabrication: new interfaces for digital fabrication , 2010, TEI.

[20]  Emrecan Gulay.  Merging Physical and Digital in the Initial Design Stages of Architecture , 2020, ISS Companion.

[21]  Majken Kirkegaard Rasmussen,et al.  Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions , 2012, CHI.

[22]  Fumihisa Shibata,et al.  Enjoyable carving with ChiselDevice in mixed reality space , 2017, VRST.

[23]  George W. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Exploring interactive curve and surface manipulation using a bend and twist sensitive input strip , 1999, SI3D.

[24]  Arthur Lebée,et al.  From Folds to Structures, a Review , 2015 .

[25]  Jasna Cikic-Tovarovic,et al.  Folded structures in modern architecture , 2012 .

[26]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Recompose: direct and gestural interaction with an actuated surface , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[27]  Lambros Malafouris,et al.  Models, Mathematics and Materials in Digital Architecture , 2017, Cognition Beyond the Brain.

[28]  Martin Kilian,et al.  Curved folding , 2008, ACM Trans. Graph..

[29]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Shape-Aware Material: Interactive Fabrication with ShapeMe , 2018, UIST.

[30]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Illuminating clay: a 3-D tangible interface for landscape analysis , 2002, CHI.

[31]  Y Wang,et al.  Bringing Clay and Sand into Digital Design — Continuous Tangible user Interfaces , 2004 .

[32]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Relief: a scalable actuated shape display , 2010, TEI '10.

[33]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  An interface for virtual 3D sculpting via physical proxy , 2006, GRAPHITE '06.

[34]  Shajay Bhooshan,et al.  Design-friendly strategies for computational form-finding of curved-folded geometries: a case study , 2014, ANSS 2014.

[35]  Yoichiro Kawaguchi.  Gemotion Screen: A Generative, Emotional, Interactive 3D Display , 2008 .

[36]  Hod Lipson,et al.  The ModelCraft framework: Capturing freehand annotations and edits to facilitate the 3D model design process using a digital pen , 2009, TCHI.

[37]  Camilla Groth.  Making Sense Through Hands: Design And Craft Practice Analysed As Embodied Cognition , 2017 .

[38]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Design Things: Models, Scenarios, Prototypes , 2012 .

[40]  Caitlin Mueller,et al.  Using 3D direct manipulation for real-time structural design exploration , 2018 .

[41]  Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al.  SPATA: Spatio-Tangible Tools for Fabrication-Aware Design , 2015, TEI.

[42]  Fumihisa Shibata,et al.  Virtual Handcrafting: Building Virtual Wood Models Using ToolDevice , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[43]  David A. Huffman,et al.  Curvature and Creases: A Primer on Paper , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[44]  Ertu Unver,et al.  A comparative study of 3D scanning in engineering, product and transport design and fashion design education , 2009, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[45]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Tangible interaction + graphical interpretation: a new approach to 3D modeling , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[46]  Joseph M. Gattas,et al.  Elastica surface generation of curved-crease origami , 2017 .

[47]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Pictionaire: supporting collaborative design work by integrating physical and digital artifacts , 2010, CSCW '10.