Three-dimensional design of a large-displacement morphing wing droop nose device

The numerical three-dimensional structural design of a large-displacement flexible morphing wing leading edge, otherwise known as a droop nose, is presented in this article. The droop nose is an essential component of a novel internally blown high-lift system for a transport aircraft to delay stall and reduce internal compressor requirements. A design chain consisting of optimization procedures was used to arrive at the structural design of the droop nose composed of a composite fiberglass skin with integral stringers and supporting kinematic mechanisms. The optimization tools aim to produce a design with minimal error to the critical target shapes. A maximum final error of 10.09 mm between calculated and target trajectories of the stringers was found after the kinematic optimization stage. After inputting the kinematic optimization results into the skin optimization stage and solving, a maximum error in the order of 13 mm and curvature difference 0.0028 1/mm were calculated, occurring in the outboard region. Prior two-dimensional analyses with similar shape deviations showed 0.4% lift reduction though further three-dimensional investigations are required. Concepts for integrating industrial requirements abrasion and lightning strike protection and in-flight de-icing into a multifunctional skin show promise and the resulting aerodynamic surface quality was found to be adequate.

[1]  Peter Horst,et al.  Buckling of multiple discrete composite bundles in the elastomeric foundation of a curvature-morphing skin , 2015 .

[2]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[3]  Johannes Riemenschneider,et al.  Evaluation of a Compliant Droop-Nose Morphing Wing Tip via Experimental Tests , 2017 .

[4]  Charles Chary,et al.  Development and Validation of a Bird Strike Protection System for an Enhanced Adaptive Droop Nose , 2016 .

[5]  Yanju Liu,et al.  Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review , 2016 .

[6]  S. Kota,et al.  An Effective Method of Synthesizing Compliant Adaptive Structures using Load Path Representation , 2005 .

[7]  Markus Kintscher,et al.  Assessment of the SARISTU Enhanced Adaptive Droop Nose , 2016 .

[8]  R. Radespiel,et al.  SFB 880: fundamentals of high lift for future commercial aircraft , 2014 .

[9]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  Compliant structures-based wing and wingtip morphing devices , 2016 .

[10]  Peter Horst,et al.  A finite element unit-cell method for homogenised mechanical properties of heterogeneous plates , 2014 .

[11]  Holger Wendland,et al.  Scattered Data Approximation: Conditionally positive definite functions , 2004 .

[12]  Rolf Radespiel,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Droop Nose for Coanda Flap Applications , 2014 .

[13]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[14]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Realization of Morphing Wings: A Multidisciplinary Challenge , 2012 .

[15]  Roeland De Breuker,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of the Morphing Leading Edge Concept , 2015 .

[16]  Shaker A. Meguid,et al.  Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges , 2010 .

[17]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations: Preface , 2003 .

[18]  Michael Rose,et al.  Optimization Tool Assessment for a Large-displacementCompliant Morphing Wing Leading Edge , 2016 .

[19]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  DESIGN OF A SMART LEADING EDGE DEVICE FOR LOW SPEED WIND TUNNEL TESTS IN THE EUROPEAN PROJECT SADE , 2011 .

[20]  P. Horst,et al.  A NEW CURVATURE MORPHING SKIN: MANUFACTURING, EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS , 2014 .

[21]  Peter Horst,et al.  Extremely deformable morphing leading edge: Optimization, design and structural testing , 2017 .

[22]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Morphing Aircraft Systems: Historical Perspectives and Future Challenges , 2013 .