Simultaneous correction of the time and location bias associated with a reported crash by exploiting the spatiotemporal evolution of travel speed

Abstract Accurate occurrence time and location of a reported crash are critical to effective crash analysis. Although there has been a proliferation of studies that attempt to correct the bias associated with a reported crash, most, if not all, of them focus exclusively on correcting the location bias. In this research, we propose to simultaneously correct the time and location bias associated with a reported crash, which is new to the literature. In our approach, we first follow standard procedures to identify the set of candidate links in the vicinity of the reported crash location. We then develop an integer programming model with a set of novel constraints to identify the candidate whose spatiotemporal evolution of travel speed is most congruent with the occurrence of a crash. We subsequently use the time and location where travel speed begins to drop to correct the bias associated with this crash. We prove that the spatiotemporal impact region, which characterizes the evolution of travel speed, estimated by our model is consistent with the propagation of shockwaves even when there are multiple candidate links and the exact occurrence time and location of the crash are unknown. This relaxes the standard assumptions required by existing models in the literature. We validate our model using real crash data in Beijing and find that our model can reduce the average bias in time from 7.3 min to 1.6 min, or a 78.08% reduction; and reduce the average bias in location from 0.156 km to 0.024 km, or a 84.62% reduction.

[1]  B Anbaroglu,et al.  Non-recurrent traffic congestion detection on heterogeneous urban road networks , 2015 .

[2]  Chao Wang,et al.  A spatio-temporal analysis of the impact of congestion on traffic safety on major roads in the UK , 2013 .

[3]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A latent variable representation of count data models to accommodate spatial and temporal dependence: application to predicting crash frequency at intersections , 2011 .

[4]  Bin Jia,et al.  Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: Model and empirical verification , 2014, 1412.0445.

[5]  Rui Jiang,et al.  Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow , 2016 .

[6]  David Pitfield,et al.  High accuracy crash mapping using fuzzy logic , 2014 .

[7]  Andrew P Tarko,et al.  Probabilistic Determination of Crash Locations in a Road Network with Imperfect Data , 2009 .

[8]  Jonathan P Masinick,et al.  An analysis on the impact of rubbernecking on urban freeway traffic. , 2004 .

[9]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Arterial travel time forecast with streaming data: A hybrid approach of flow modeling and machine learning , 2012 .

[10]  Richard Andrášik,et al.  Identification of hazardous road locations of traffic accidents by means of kernel density estimation and cluster significance evaluation. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Mohammed Quddus,et al.  Crash data quality for road safety research: Current state and future directions. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Mohammed Quddus,et al.  Network-level accident-mapping: Distance based pattern matching using artificial neural network. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Becky P Y Loo,et al.  Validating crash locations for quantitative spatial analysis: a GIS-based approach. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Yasuo Asakura,et al.  Interactive online machine learning approach for activity-travel survey , 2015, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[15]  David A Noyce,et al.  System for Digitizing Information on Wisconsin's Crash Locations , 2007 .

[16]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  Comparison of Identification and Ranking Methodologies for Speed-Related Crash Locations , 2006 .

[17]  David Pitfield,et al.  Multilevel Logistic Regression Modeling for Crash Mapping in Metropolitan Areas , 2015 .

[18]  Younshik Chung,et al.  Quantification of Nonrecurrent Congestion Delay Caused by Freeway Accidents and Analysis of Causal Factors , 2011 .

[19]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Accessible and Practical Geocoding Method for Traffic Collision Record Mapping , 2014 .

[20]  Will Recker,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of Traffic Congestion Caused by Rubbernecking at Freeway Accidents , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  Younshik Chung,et al.  How accurate is accident data in road safety research? An application of vehicle black box data regarding pedestrian-to-taxi accidents in Korea. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  K Austin,et al.  The identification of mistakes in road accident records: Part 1, Locational variables. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Will Recker,et al.  A Methodological Approach for Estimating Temporal and Spatial Extent of Delays Caused by Freeway Accidents , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  Younshik Chung,et al.  Identifying Primary and Secondary Crashes from Spatiotemporal Crash Impact Analysis , 2013 .

[25]  Bo Du,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Model for Estimating Temporal and Spatial Freeway Work Zone Delay Using Probe-Vehicle Data , 2016 .

[26]  Will Recker,et al.  Frailty Models for the Estimation of Spatiotemporally Maximum Congested Impact Information on Freeway Accidents , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[28]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Congestion and Safety: A Spatial Analysis of London , 2003 .

[29]  Chao Wang,et al.  Impact of traffic congestion on road accidents: a spatial analysis of the M25 motorway in England. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Zhuo Chen,et al.  Non-recurrent congestion analysis using data-driven spatiotemporal approach for information construction , 2016 .

[31]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  A comparison of address point, parcel and street geocoding techniques , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[32]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  A Bayesian Semi-Parametric Model to Estimate Relationships between Crash Counts and Roadway Characteristics , 2010 .

[33]  Hong Yang,et al.  Use of ubiquitous probe vehicle data for identifying secondary crashes , 2017 .

[34]  S. P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Driver heterogeneity in rubbernecking behaviour at an incident site (poster) , 2015 .

[35]  Xiao Qin,et al.  Intelligent geocoding system to locate traffic crashes. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  L H Nitz,et al.  Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: I. Spatial patterns. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Geert Wets,et al.  Ranking and selecting dangerous crash locations: correcting for the number of passengers and Bayesian ranking plots. , 2006, Journal of safety research.