The Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities

This study investigated the effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of six middle school students with learning disabilities. Conditions of the multiple baseline, across-subjects design included baseline, two levels of treatment, setting and temporal generalization, and retraining. For Treatment 1, subjects received either cognitive or metacognitive strategy instruction. Treatment 2 consisted of instruction in the complementary component of the instructional program so that all subjects eventually received both cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction. This design allowed a componential analysis of the content as well as sequence of instruction. Generally, subjects improved their mathematical problem solving as measured by performance on one-, two-, and three-step word problems. Discussion focused on effectiveness of treatment, acquisition and application of strategic knowledge, error pattern analysis, and the need to tailor instruction to the learner's individual characteristics.

[1]  Thomas J. Shuell,et al.  Phases of Meaningful Learning , 1990 .

[2]  D. Forrest-Pressley,et al.  Metacognition, cognition, and human performance , 1985 .

[3]  W. F. Vonderhaar.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE SCALE IQ'S AND SUBTEST SCORES OF DEAF CHILDREN ON THE WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE FOR CHILDREN AND THE WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE FOR CHILDREN-REVISED , 1977 .

[4]  M. Montague,et al.  The Effect of Cognitive Strategy Training on Verbal Math Problem Solving Performance of Learning Disabled Adolescents , 1986, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  M. Montague.  Affective, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Attributes of Eighth-Grade Mathematical Problem Solvers. , 1991 .

[6]  T. Shuell.  Cognitive Conceptions of Learning , 1986 .

[7]  J. Torgesen,et al.  Component processes in working memory. , 1987 .

[8]  C. Bos,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring in Learning Disabled and Average Students , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[9]  J. Borkowski,et al.  Cognition in Special Children: Comparative Approaches to Retardation, Learning Disabilities, and Giftedness , 1987 .

[10]  Ann L. Brown.  Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition. Technical Report No. 47. , 1977 .

[11]  B. Wong.  CHAPTER 4 – Metacognition and Learning Disabilities , 1985 .

[12]  Karen K. Wixson,et al.  Becoming a strategic reader , 1983 .

[13]  S. Graham,et al.  Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. , 1989 .

[14]  M. Pressley,et al.  Strategy Instruction Research Comes of Age , 1989 .

[15]  D. Reid,et al.  Differences That Make a Difference , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[16]  Anne W. Graves,et al.  Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. , 1986 .

[17]  B. Slife,et al.  Separability of Metacognition and Cognition: Problem Solving in Learning Disabled and Regular Students. , 1985 .

[18]  Candace S. Bos,et al.  Cognitive and metacognitive characteristics of eighth grade students' mathematical problem solving , 1990 .

[19]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Students' Metacognitive Knowledge about How to Write Informational Texts , 1988 .