Maintaining alignment over the long-term: lessons from the evolution of an electronic point of sale system

Research in both the organizational and information systems areas suggests that aligning information systems and dimensions of the organization improves performance. However, the dynamic nature of both information systems and organizations makes a close alignment more an aspiration than a state. This paper examines alignment from the perspective of the management processes through which companies may achieve and sustain alignment in dynamic environments. In so doing they may also develop core capabilities in managing IS innovation, which enable sustained competitive advantage. The paper traces the evolution of alignment in a company that used information systems to develop the business in new strategic directions, and shows how semi-structures contributed to this.

[1]  SiggelkowNicolaj,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer , 2003 .

[2]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[3]  GurbaxaniVijay,et al.  Review: information technology and organizational performance , 2004 .

[4]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[5]  Julia Hodgson,et al.  The chimpanzees' tea party: a new metaphor for project managers , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[7]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model , 2001 .

[8]  Nigel Waite,et al.  New entrants in the financial services sector: the case of Kwik‐Fit insurance services , 2001 .

[9]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Detours in the Path toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment , 2001 .

[10]  D. Knights,et al.  Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management , 1995 .

[11]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Information Systems strategy formulation , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[12]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[13]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[15]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[16]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[18]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Steps to the future : fresh thinking on the management of IT-based organizational transformation , 1997 .

[19]  David Boddy,et al.  Implementing interorganizational IT systems: lessons from a call centre project , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[20]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[21]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Shaping Strategic Change , 1992 .

[22]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[23]  Philip Powell,et al.  SMEs: aligning IS and the strategic context , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[24]  C. Cahill,et al.  Success and failure in implementing supply chain partnering: an empirical study , 1998 .

[25]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame , 1984 .

[26]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[27]  Bernardo Batiz-Lazo.  Escalation in Decision Making , 2003 .

[28]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Strategic alignment and enterprise systems implementation: the case of Metalco , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Janice M. Burn,et al.  IS innovation and organizational alignment — a professional juggling act , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[30]  A. Boonstra,et al.  The Limited Acceptance of an Electronic Prescription System by General Practitioners: Reasons and Practical Implications , 2004 .

[31]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[32]  A. Pettigrew.  Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[33]  Roderick Martin.  Managers divided: Organizational politics and information technology management: by DAVID KNIGHTS and FERGUS MURRAY, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1994, 271pp , 1996 .

[34]  François Bergeron,et al.  An information technology trilogy: business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance , 2001, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Frobisher Crescent.  Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992-1996 , 1999 .

[36]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[37]  HullandJohn,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research , 2004 .

[38]  David Boddy,et al.  Organizations in the Network Age , 1995 .

[39]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Why information systems fail: a case study approach , 1993 .

[40]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Managing Information Systems: An Organisational Perspective , 2002 .

[41]  Joe McDonagh.  Not for the Faint Hearted: Social and Organizational Challenges in IT-Enabled Change , 2001 .

[42]  Barbara Austin,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning , 1994 .