Reducing image artifact in diffuse optical tomography by iterative perturbation correction based on multiwavelength measurements

Abstract. Ultrasound (US) guided diffuse optical tomography has demonstrated great potential for breast cancer diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and chemotherapy response prediction. Optical measurements of four different wavelengths are used to reconstruct unknown optical absorption maps, which are then used to calculate the hemoglobin concentration distribution of the US visible lesion. Reconstructed absorption maps are prone to image artifacts from outliers in measurement data from tissue heterogeneity, bad coupling between tissue and light guides, and motion by patient or operator. We propose an automated iterative perturbation correction algorithm to reduce image artifacts based on the structural similarity index (SSIM) of absorption maps of four optical wavelengths. The initial image is estimated from the truncated pseudoinverse solution. The SSIM was calculated for each wavelength to assess its similarity with other wavelengths. An absorption map is repeatedly reconstructed and projected back into measurement space to quantify projection error. Outlier measurements with highest projection errors are iteratively removed until all wavelength images are structurally similar with SSIM values greater than a threshold. Clinical data demonstrate statistically significant improvement in image artifact reduction.

[1]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Diffuse optical tomography using semiautomated coregistered ultrasound measurements , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Automated data selection method to improve robustness of diffuse optical tomography for breast cancer imaging. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[3]  Meltem Izzetoglu,et al.  Motion artifact cancellation in NIR spectroscopy using discrete Kalman filtering , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[4]  David A Boas,et al.  Optode positional calibration in diffuse optical tomography. , 2003, Applied optics.

[5]  E. Miller,et al.  Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[6]  M. Huang,et al.  Benign versus malignant breast masses: optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  Y. Tanikawa,et al.  Reduction of image artifacts induced by change in the optode coupling in time-resolved diffuse optical tomography. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography for Predicting and Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancers , 2016, Ultrasonic imaging.

[9]  Quing Zhu,et al.  An Automated Preprocessing Method for Diffuse Optical Tomography to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis , 2018, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[10]  Jennifer J. Gibson,et al.  Electromagnetic breast imaging: results of a pilot study in women with abnormal mammograms. , 2007, Radiology.

[11]  N. Chen,et al.  Simultaneous near-infrared diffusive light and ultrasound imaging. , 2001, Applied optics.

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Gabriel Prieto Renieblas,et al.  Structural similarity index family for image quality assessment in radiological images , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.

[14]  D Boas,et al.  Simultaneous imaging and optode calibration with diffuse optical tomography. , 2001, Optics express.

[15]  G. Dumont,et al.  Wavelet based motion artifact removal for Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[16]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Sensitivity of MRI-guided near-infrared spectroscopy clinical breast exam data and its impact on diagnostic performance. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[17]  M. Schweiger,et al.  Image reconstruction in optical tomography in the presence of coupling errors. , 2007, Applied optics.

[18]  M Wolf,et al.  How to detect and reduce movement artifacts in near-infrared imaging using moving standard deviation and spline interpolation , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[19]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Improving image quality of diffuse optical tomography with a projection-error-based adaptive regularization method. , 2008, Optics express.

[20]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Imaging in breast cancer: Diffuse optics in breast cancer: detecting tumors in pre-menopausal women and monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[21]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Two step imaging reconstruction using truncated pseudoinverse as a preliminary estimate in ultrasound guided diffuse optical tomography. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[22]  V. Ntziachristos,et al.  MRI-guided diffuse optical spectroscopy of malignant and benign breast lesions. , 2002, Neoplasia.

[23]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Compact ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography system for breast cancer imaging , 2018, Journal of biomedical optics.

[24]  D. Boas,et al.  Volumetric diffuse optical tomography of brain activity. , 2003, Optics letters.

[25]  Soren D. Konecky,et al.  Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by in-vivo three-dimensional parallel-plate diffuse optical tomography. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[26]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Two-step reconstruction method using global optimization and conjugate gradient for ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[27]  Ville Kolehmainen,et al.  Compensation of optode sensitivity and position errors in diffuse optical tomography using the approximation error approach. , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[28]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Diffuse optics in breast cancer: detecting tumors in pre-menopausal women and monitoring neoadjuvant , 2005 .

[29]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C (2nd ed.): the art of scientific computing , 1992 .