Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life

Hand prostheses are usually controlled by electromyographic (EMG) signals from the remnant muscles of the residual limb. Most prostheses used today are controlled with very simple techniques using only two EMG electrodes that allow to control a single prosthetic function at a time only. Recently, modern prosthesis controllers based on EMG classification, have become clinically available, which allow to directly access more functions, but still in a sequential manner only. We have recently shown in laboratory tests that a regression-based mapping from EMG signals into prosthetic control commands allows for a simultaneous activation of two functions and an independent control of their velocities with high reliability. Here we aimed to study how such regression-based control performs in daily life in a two-month case study. The performance is evaluated in functional tests and with a questionnaire at the beginning and the end of this phase and compared with the participant’s own prosthesis, controlled with a classical approach. Already 1 day after training of the regression model, the participant with transradial amputation outperformed the performance achieved with his own Michelangelo hand in two out of three functional metrics. No retraining of the model was required during the entire study duration. During the use of the system at home, the performance improved further and outperformed the conventional control in all three metrics. This study demonstrates that the high fidelity of linear regression-based prosthesis control is not restricted to a laboratory environment, but can be transferred to daily use.

[1]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Influence of the weight actions of the hand prosthesis on the performance of pattern recognition based myoelectric control: Preliminary study , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Spatial Filtering for Robust Myoelectric Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Ali Hussaini,et al.  Refined clothespin relocation test and assessment of motion , 2017, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  Dario Farina,et al.  Myoelectric Control of Artificial Limbs¿Is There a Need to Change Focus? [In the Spotlight] , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  K. Englehart,et al.  Resolving the Limb Position Effect in Myoelectric Pattern Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Real-time robustness evaluation of regression based myoelectric control against arm position change and donning/doffing , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Multi-Position Training Improves Robustness of Pattern Recognition and Reduces Limb-Position Effect in Prosthetic Control , 2017, Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO.

[10]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Kevin Warwick,et al.  Case Studies to Demonstrate the Range of Applications of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure , 2009 .

[12]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[13]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Stable myoelectric control of a hand prosthesis using non-linear incremental learning , 2014, Front. Neurorobot..

[14]  Dario Farina,et al.  Simultaneous control of multiple functions of bionic hand prostheses: Performance and robustness in end users , 2018, Science Robotics.

[15]  Dario Farina,et al.  Long term stability of surface EMG pattern classification for prosthetic control , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  Support Vector Regression for Improved Real-Time, Simultaneous Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  Extending mode switching to multiple degrees of freedom in hand prosthesis control is not efficient , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Kianoush Nazarpour,et al.  Combined influence of forearm orientation and muscular contraction on EMG pattern recognition , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Ashok Muzumdar Powered upper limb prostheses : control, implementation and clinical application , 2004 .

[23]  William J. Hanson CONDUCTIVE INSERTS TO ACQUIRE MYOELECTRIC SIGNALS THROUGH SILICONE LINERS , 2008 .

[24]  D. Farina,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Regression Techniques for Simultaneous and Proportional Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Ashok Muzumdar,et al.  Powered Upper Limb Prostheses , 2004, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[26]  D. Childress,et al.  Myoelectric control , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[27]  T. Kuiken,et al.  A Comparison of Pattern Recognition Control and Direct Control of a Multiple Degree-of-Freedom Transradial Prosthesis , 2016, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[28]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effects of Electrode Size and Orientation on the Sensitivity of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Systems to Electrode Shift , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Dario Farina,et al.  Improving the Robustness of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition for Upper Limb Prostheses by Covariate Shift Adaptation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.