Why are natural sounds detected faster than pips?

Simple reaction times (RTs) were used to measure differences in processing time between natural animal sounds and artificial sounds. When the artificial stimuli were sequences of short tone pulses, the animal sounds were detected faster than the artificial sounds. The animal sounds were then compared with acoustically modified versions (white noise modulated by the temporal envelope of the animal sounds). No differences in RTs were observed between the animal sounds and their modified counterparts. These results show that the fast detection observed for natural sounds, in the present task, could be explained by their acoustic properties.

[1]  Frank A Russo,et al.  Urgency is a non-monotonic function of pulse rate. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Clara Suied,et al.  Integration of auditory and visual information in the recognition of realistic objects , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[4]  P. Susini,et al.  Evaluating warning sound urgency with reaction times. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  R. Chocholle,et al.  Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité à diverses fréquences , 1940 .

[6]  R. Patterson,et al.  The lower limit of melodic pitch. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[8]  R. R. Patterson,et al.  Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft , 1982 .

[9]  J Edworthy,et al.  Improving Auditory Warning Design: Relationship between Warning Sound Parameters and Perceived Urgency , 1991, Human factors.

[10]  D. Västfjäll,et al.  Emotional responses to music: the need to consider underlying mechanisms. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  R Graham,et al.  Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[12]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal integration and multiple looks. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Information processing models generating lognormally distributed reaction times , 1993 .