A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.

The detection of proximal surface caries by the visual interpretation of bitewing radiographs is known to be relatively inaccurate. The present study was designed to examine whether computer image processing could improve the diagnostic accuracy. A computer-aided, software-driven, TV-based system was used to digitize conventional radiographs and digitally process the images using histogram equalization and grey-scale inversion to enhance the images. The computer-enhanced images were compared with conventional intra-oral radiographs for the detection of proximal surface caries using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The results indicate that the digital image processing techniques used did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of dental radiographs. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy could be detected between the non-enhanced digital images and conventional film-based images for the detection of proximal surface caries.

[1]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  A digital subtraction technique for dental radiography. , 1983, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[2]  L. Christersson,et al.  Progression of untreated periodontitis as assessed by subtraction radiography. , 1986, Journal of periodontal research.

[3]  L Hollender,et al.  Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries. , 1984, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  W D Foley,et al.  Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System. , 1986, Radiology.

[5]  N. Pitts,et al.  Image analysis of bitewing radiographs: a histologically validated comparison with visual assessments of radiolucency depth in enamel , 1986, British Dental Journal.

[6]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions. , 1983, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[7]  R L Webber,et al.  Computers in dental radiography: a scenario for the future. , 1985, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[8]  B. Manaster,et al.  Digital subtraction arthrography of the temporomandibular joint. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  W D McDavid,et al.  Spatial resolution requirements for digitizing dental radiographs. , 1989, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[10]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[11]  N B Pitts,et al.  Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis. , 1984, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[12]  W D McDavid,et al.  Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging. , 1988, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[13]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Statistical contrast enhancement of subtraction images for radiographic caries diagnosis. , 1982, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[14]  Adaptive histogram equalization in digital radiography of destructive skeletal lesions. , 1988, Radiology.

[15]  R. L. Webber,et al.  Fitting an image to the eye: a conceptual basis for preprocessing radiographs. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.