Non-minimal state variable feedback decoupling control for multivariable continuous-time systems

Most research into non-minimal state variable feedback control, in which the state vector is implemented directly from the measured input and output signals of the controlled process, has considered discrete-time systems represented using either the backward shift or delta operator. However, mechanistic models with physically meaningful parameters are often expressed in terms of differential equations, represented using the Laplace transform or s-operator, and this article is concerned with multivariable design for such models. The controllability conditions are developed and it is shown how the introduction of a diagonal polynomial matrix for filtering yields a control system that is immediately realisable in practice. Worked examples include optimal control with multi-objective optimisation and pole assignment design with analytical multivariable decoupling, with the latter illustrated by its application to a nonlinear wind turbine simulation.

[1]  Gerard Ledwich,et al.  Adaptive decouplers for multivariable systems : input dynamics compensation and output feedback approaches , 1992 .

[2]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal control: linear quadratic methods , 1990 .

[3]  Peter C. Young Continuous-time model identification, model reduction and emulation , 2010 .

[4]  P. Young,et al.  Proportional-integral-plus (PIP) design for delta (delta) operator systems Part 2. MIMO systems , 1998 .

[5]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Direct digital and adaptive control by input-output state variable feedback pole assignment , 1987 .

[6]  S. Liberty,et al.  Linear Systems , 2010, Scientific Parallel Computing.

[7]  C. James Taylor,et al.  The Development of a Prototype of a Multi-Arm Robotic System for Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) Applications within the Nuclear Industry. , 2009 .

[8]  P. Young,et al.  An approach to the linear multivariable servomechanism problem. , 1972 .

[9]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Continuous time proportional-integral-plus (PIP) control with filtering polynomials , 1998 .

[10]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Application of multi-objective optimisation to compensator design for SISO control systems , 1986 .

[11]  Diego J. Pedregal,et al.  Environmental time series analysis and forecasting with the Captain toolbox , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Non-linear control by input–output state variable feedback pole assignment , 2009, Int. J. Control.

[13]  W. Leithead,et al.  Control of variable speed wind turbines: Dynamic models , 2000 .

[14]  D. Luenberger Canonical forms for linear multivariable systems , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Vasileios Exadaktylos,et al.  Multi-objective performance optimisation for model predictive control by goal attainment , 2010, Int. J. Control.

[16]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Modelling and PIP control of a glasshouse micro-climate , 1994 .

[17]  Philip Cross Continuous-time PIP control of marine energy converters , 2012 .

[18]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Continuous-time non-minimal state-space design , 2007, Int. J. Control.

[19]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Non-minimal state-space model-based continuous-time model predictive control with constraints , 2009, Int. J. Control.

[20]  Roger M. Goodall,et al.  LQG and GA solutions for active steering of railway vehicles , 2000 .

[21]  P. Young,et al.  State space control system design based on non-minimal state-variable feedback: Further generalization and unification results , 2000 .

[22]  E. M. Shaban,et al.  Multivariable proportional-integral-plus (PIP) control of the ALSTOM nonlinear gasifier simulation , 2006 .

[23]  Keith J. Burnham,et al.  Controllable forms for stabilising pole assignment design of generalised bilinear systems , 2011 .

[24]  B. Gopinath On the control of linear multiple input-output systems , 1971 .