The effect of local change in habitat quality on populations of migratory species

1. Habitat deterioration is a major problem world-wide as a result of processes such as change in land use, introduced species, human disturbance and exploitation of food supplies. Many studies have shown that habitat change can have considerable effect on the numbers of individuals using a site. For migratory species, however, the consequences for the total population cannot be deduced from local studies. 2. For a migratory species, the change in total population size ΔN, as a consequence of habitat change in the wintering area, can be calculated from ΔN = LMγd′/(b′ + d′), where γ is the expected proportional change in the number of birds using a site as a result of the habitat change, L is the area affected, M is the density of individuals using the site prior to habitat change, b′ is the strength of the per capita density-dependent breeding output, and d′ is the strength of the per capita density-dependent winter mortality. Similarly the consequences of habitat change in the breeding area can be calculated from ΔN = LMγb′/(b′ + d′). 3. The same approach can be used for predicting the consequences of improvements in habitat quality. 4. A worked example is given to illustrate how this approach could be used to predict the consequences for the total population of changes in the food supply of oystercatchers within one estuary. 5. There is a need for more measures of γ, the expected proportional change in the number of birds using a site as a result of various forms of habitat deterioration, and the strengths of density dependence.

[1]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  A Spatial Depletion Model of the Responses of Grazing Wildfowl to the Availability of Intertidal Vegetation , 1996 .

[2]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Predicting the consequences of habitat loss for migratory populations , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Bruno J. Ens,et al.  Territory Quality, Parental Effort and Reproductive Success of Oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) , 1992 .

[4]  H. Kokko,et al.  Optimal Floating and Queuing Strategies: Consequences for Density Dependence and Habitat Loss , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[5]  B. Ens,et al.  Population consequences of winter habitat loss in a migratory shorebird. I. Estimating model parameters , 1995 .

[6]  R. Clarke,et al.  Population consequences of winter habitat loss in a migratory shorebird. II: Model predictions , 1995 .

[7]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Deriving population parameters from individual variations in foraging behaviour. I: Empirical game theory distribution model of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis , 1995 .

[8]  P. Meire,et al.  Changes in the waterbird populations of the Oosterschelde (SW Netherlands) as a result of large-scale coastal engineering works , 1994 .

[9]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Factors affecting the feeding distribution of red-breasted geese Branta ruficollis wintering in Romania , 1993 .

[10]  W. Sutherland From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[11]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  A spatial depletion model of the interaction between bean geese and wigeon with the consequences for habitat management , 1994 .

[12]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Intertidal habitat loss and wildfowl numbers: applications of a spatial depletion model , 1998 .

[13]  W. Sutherland Food supply and dispersal in the determination of wintering population levels of oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus , 1982 .

[14]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  A Method to Quantify the Effects of Human Disturbance on Animal Populations , 1996 .

[15]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  The effects of traffic on the density of breeding birds in Dutch agricultural grasslands , 1996 .