Emphasizing symmetry issues in business interaction analysis and IOS

This paper argues for the need to thoroughly understand the issue of symmetry and asymmetry, when analysing business interaction supported by inter-organisational information systems (IOS). Business interaction can be defined as consisting of business communication and exchange of value. Business action theory (BAT) divides business processes into six generic phases encompassing generic, interactive actions between a seller and a buyer. Different types of exchange occur in these phases. However, the BAT phases do not, in the present version, take the issue of symmetry and asymmetry (power between suppliers and customers) into enough account. In this paper, we elaborate the concepts of symmetry and asymmetry in business interaction in order to reach a better understanding of different types of relationships. We also highlight IOS as an important means that can both facilitate symmetry and cause asymmetry in a business interaction. The aim of the paper is to enhance the applicability of BAT for business interaction analysis by including and emphasising the notion of symmetry and asymmetry.

[1]  J. Habermas The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[2]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Using Business Action Theory for Dyadic Analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[4]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[5]  Karin Axelsson Interaction between Actors and Information Systems in Web-based Imaginary Organisations – Experiences from two Case Studies , 2004 .

[6]  Ulf Melin,et al.  Information Systems and Process Orientation: Evaluation and Change Using Business Actions Theory , 1999 .

[7]  H Hkansson,et al.  The Burden Of Relationships Or Who's Next , 1995 .

[8]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Relationship management vs business transactions : Business interaction as design of business interaction , 2002 .

[9]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Generic business frameworks and action modeling , 1996 .

[10]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Completing the Loops , 1995 .

[11]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality , 1992 .

[12]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[13]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[14]  C. Oliver Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[15]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Reason and the rationalization of society , 1984 .

[16]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  The six phases of business processes -- business communication and the exchange of value , 1998 .

[17]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Understanding B2B Interaction - A Model To Accentuate Inter-organisational Systems Design Issues , 2002, ECIS.

[18]  Thomas S. Wurster,et al.  Blown to Bits: How the New Economics of Information Transforms Strategy , 1999 .

[19]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Analysing Business Interaction in a Virtual Organisation: Using Business Action Theory to Study Complex Inter-Organisational Contexts , 2003, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[20]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Information Systems and Process Orientation — Evaluation and Change Using Business Action Theory , 2003 .

[21]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[22]  H. Håkansson International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach , 1982 .