The role of attention and study time in explicit and implicit memory for unfamiliar visual stimuli

The effects of limited attentional resources and study time on explicit and implicit memory were studied using Schacter and Cooper’s possible and impossible objects in their recognition and object decision paradigm. In one experiment, when attention at study was limited by a flanking digits procedure, object recognition was diminished but object decision priming for possible objects was unaffected; in another experiment, limiting attention plus reducing stimulus study time impaired object recognition and eliminated object priming. Recognition memory and perceptual priming for previously unfamiliar visual stimuli were both influenced by attention, although to different degrees. The intervening variable of study time determined the degree to which priming was affected by attentional resources. These results support a limited capacity attentional model for both recognition and perceptual priming of unfamiliar visual stimuli, and they highlight the need for assessing the interaction of attentional resources and study time in explicit and implicit memory tasks.

[1]  N. Brody,et al.  Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  N. Mulligan.  Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[3]  G. Mandler,et al.  Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. , 1984 .

[4]  R. Kinchla.  Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring. , 1994, Psychological review.

[5]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  R. Kinchla.  Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring. , 1994, Psychological review.

[7]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit memory: a selective review. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  R. Ivry,et al.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Gail Musen.  Effects of verbal labeling and exposure duration on implicit memory for visual patterns. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  John G. Seamon,et al.  The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. , 1995 .

[14]  H. Roediger.  Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[15]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention , 1989 .

[16]  N. Mulligan,et al.  Divided attention and indirect memory tests , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[17]  L. Cooper,et al.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions , 1990 .

[18]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Bias in the priming of object decisions. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  L. Cooper,et al.  Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and reflection. , 1992 .

[21]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  D. Schacter.  Implicit memory: History and current status. , 1987 .

[25]  M. Smith,et al.  Repetition priming of words and pseudowords in divided attention and in amnesia. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Kevin J. Hawley,et al.  Long-term perceptual memory for briefly exposed words as a function of awareness and attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Memory without conscious recollection: A tutorial review from a neuropsychological perspective. , 1994 .

[28]  L. Cooper,et al.  Bias in the priming of object decisions: logic, assumption, and data. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  N. Brody,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  How should implicit memory phenomena be modeled? , 1995, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[32]  Mary Susan Weldon,et al.  Why do pictures produce priming on the word-fragment completion test? A study of encoding and retrieval factors , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[33]  David Allbritton,et al.  METAPHOR-BASED SCHEMAS AND TEXT REPRESENTATIONS : MAKING CONNECTIONS THROUGH CONCEPTUAL METAPHORS , 1995 .

[34]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[35]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[36]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  D L Schacter,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for novel visual objects: structure and function. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.