Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method

BackgroundWe studied human locomotor adaptation to powered ankle-foot orthoses with the intent of identifying differences between two different orthosis control methods. The first orthosis control method used a footswitch to provide bang-bang control (a kinematic control) and the second orthosis control method used a proportional myoelectric signal from the soleus (a physiological control). Both controllers activated an artificial pneumatic muscle providing plantar flexion torque.MethodsSubjects walked on a treadmill for two thirty-minute sessions spaced three days apart under either footswitch control (n = 6) or myoelectric control (n = 6). We recorded lower limb electromyography (EMG), joint kinematics, and orthosis kinetics. We compared stance phase EMG amplitudes, correlation of joint angle patterns, and mechanical work performed by the powered orthosis between the two controllers over time.ResultsDuring steady state at the end of the second session, subjects using proportional myoelectric control had much lower soleus and gastrocnemius activation than the subjects using footswitch control. The substantial decrease in triceps surae recruitment allowed the proportional myoelectric control subjects to walk with ankle kinematics close to normal and reduce negative work performed by the orthosis. The footswitch control subjects walked with substantially perturbed ankle kinematics and performed more negative work with the orthosis.ConclusionThese results provide evidence that the choice of orthosis control method can greatly alter how humans adapt to powered orthosis assistance during walking. Specifically, proportional myoelectric control results in larger reductions in muscle activation and gait kinematics more similar to normal compared to footswitch control.

[1]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  The RoboKnee: an exoskeleton for enhancing strength and endurance during walking , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[2]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. , 2005, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[3]  H. Herr,et al.  Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Control method of robot suit HAL working as operator's muscle using biological and dynamical information , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  The Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton , 2006, FSR.

[6]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Control and system identification for the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[8]  J A Rall,et al.  Energetic aspects of skeletal muscle contraction: implications of fiber types. , 1985, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[9]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  The effects of powered ankle-foot orthoses on joint kinematics and muscle activation during walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Mechanical performance of artificial pneumatic muscles to power an ankle-foot orthosis. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Lihua Huang,et al.  Hybrid Control of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Learning to walk with a robotic ankle exoskeleton. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  James A. Norris,et al.  Effect of augmented plantarflexion power on preferred walking speed and economy in young and older adults. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[15]  S. Prentice,et al.  Adaptation to unilateral change in lower limb mechanical properties during human walking , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  H. Kawamoto,et al.  Power assist method for HAL-3 using EMG-based feedback controller , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[17]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Power Assist System HAL-3 for Gait Disorder Person , 2002, ICCHP.

[18]  Rall Ja,et al.  Energetic aspects of skeletal muscle contraction: implications of fiber types. , 1985 .

[19]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Power assist method based on Phase Sequence and muscle force condition for HAL , 2005, Adv. Robotics.

[20]  H. Kazerooni,et al.  Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[21]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  An ankle-foot orthosis powered by artificial pneumatic muscles. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[22]  Aaron Sl,et al.  Comparison of an EMG-controlled prosthesis and the normal human biceps brachii muscle. , 1976 .

[23]  R. Kram,et al.  The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[25]  Yasuhisa Hasegawa,et al.  Intention-based walking support for paraplegia patient , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[26]  R. Stein,et al.  Comparison of an EMG-controlled prosthesis and the normal human biceps brachii muscle. , 1976, American journal of physical medicine.

[27]  Stephen C. Jacobsen,et al.  Research Robots for Applications in Artificial Intelligence, Teleoperation and Entertainment , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..