The use of design practice to teach mathematics and science

Relatively low participation in the hard sciences (mathematics, science, engineering and technology) has become a concern with respect to the capacity of Australia to meet critical infrastructure projects. This problem has its roots in poor student attitudes towards and perceptions about the study of prerequisite subjects including mathematics and science. Perception formation commences early in students’ education where students have claimed that mathematics was not intrinsically useful and was difficult to understand. With this mind, an intervention was planned and implemented in which technology and design practice was used to integrate the study of mathematics so students could produce and explain a useful artefact. The integrated design project included a focus upon instructional and regulatory discourse. Useful integration tools were developed that facilitated positive cognitive discourses such that students demonstrated a functional understanding of mathematical concepts, reported a broader and more applied understanding of the nature of mathematics and a belief that integration had helped them to make more sense of mathematics.

[1]  Rena Faye Norby It Is a Gender Issue! Changes in Attitude towards Science in a Technology Based K-8 Pre-Service Preparation Science Classroom. , 2003 .

[2]  Peter Liljedahl,et al.  Mathematical discovery and affect: the effect of AHA! experiences on undergraduate mathematics students , 2005 .

[3]  A. Thompson Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. , 1992 .

[4]  M. Hannula Attitude towards mathematics: emotions, expectations and values , 2002 .

[5]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Re/Constructing Elementary Science , 2001 .

[6]  Corinna A. Ethington,et al.  Gender Differences in a Psychological Model of Mathematics Achievement. , 1992 .

[7]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[8]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[9]  Patricia Murphy,et al.  Equity in the Classroom: Towards Effective Pedagogy for Girls and Boys , 1996 .

[10]  Johnston Anderson Being Mathematically Educated in the 21st Century: What Should It Mean? , 2002 .

[11]  Linda Stepulevage Gender/Technology Relations: Complicating the gender binary , 2001 .

[12]  Ray Land,et al.  New Basics project technical paper , 2000 .

[13]  H. Watt,et al.  Exploring Adolescent Motivations for Pursuing Maths-Related Careers. , 2005 .

[14]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[15]  C. Hoadley Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research , 2004 .

[16]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  Rethinking the mathematics curriculum , 1999 .

[17]  F. Joe Crosswhite,et al.  NCTM Standards for School Mathematics: Visions for Implementation , 1989 .

[18]  Anne Qualter Exploration - a way of learning science , 1990 .

[19]  Philip Bell,et al.  On the Theoretical Breadth of Design-Based Research in Education , 2004 .

[20]  Trevor Davies Modelling and creativity in design and technology , 1996 .

[21]  Sharon R. Mazzarella,et al.  Growing up girls : popular culture and the construction of identity , 1999 .

[22]  M. Townend Integrating Case Studies in Engineering Mathematics: A response to SARTOR 3 , 2001 .

[23]  R. Sternberg What Is an “Expert Student?” , 2003 .

[24]  Bernard Zubrowski,et al.  Integrating Science into Design Technology Projects: Using a Standard Model in the Design Process , 2002 .

[25]  Graham A. Jones,et al.  Elementary students’ access to powerful mathematical ideas , 2008 .

[26]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[27]  K. Skamp Teaching Primary Science Constructively , 1998 .

[28]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[29]  Parlo Singh Pedagogic Discourses and Student Resistance in Australian Secondary Schools , 2001 .

[30]  Lawrence C Ingvarson,et al.  National professional standards for highly accomplished teachers of science , 2002 .

[31]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Cognitive Assessment of Students' Problem Solving and Program Development Skills , 1999 .

[32]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Design Research for Sustained Innovation , 2002 .

[33]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[34]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[35]  Erik De Corte,et al.  Mainstreams and Perspectives in Research on Learning (Mathematics) From Instruction , 2004 .

[36]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[37]  Jan Lokan,et al.  Teaching mathematics in Australia : results from the TIMSS 1999 video study , 2003 .

[38]  Gary N. Marks,et al.  Longitudinal Studies of Australian Youth , 2003 .

[39]  Campbell J. McRobbie,et al.  Using Activity Theory to Investigate the Influence of Teachers' Beliefs upon their Teaching of Science through Robotics , 2004 .

[40]  Norman Reid,et al.  Attitudes towards Physics , 2002 .