Check-All-That-Apply Questions

[1]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Eye-Tracking Data: New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding. , 2008, Public opinion quarterly.

[2]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Identifying ideal products using three different consumer profiling methodologies. Comparison with external preference mapping , 2011 .

[3]  J. Krosnick.  Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[4]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  Aroma properties of young Spanish monovarietal white wines: a study using sorting task, list of terms and frequency of citation , 2008 .

[5]  Davide Giacalone,et al.  Comparison of three sensory profiling methods based on consumer perception: CATA, CATA with intensity and Napping® , 2014 .

[6]  S. M. Brown,et al.  Note on the Cochran Q Test , 1970 .

[7]  G. Israel,et al.  Can Response Order Bias Evaluations , 1990 .

[8]  Michael Greenacre,et al.  Correspondence Analysis in R, with Two- and Three-dimensional Graphics: The ca Package , 2007 .

[9]  Norman M. Bradburn,et al.  DO RESPONDENTS REALLY “MARK ALL THAT APPLY” ON SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONS? , 1994 .

[10]  Michael Meyners,et al.  Statistical inference for temporal dominance of sensations data using randomization tests , 2010 .

[11]  Jolene D. Smyth,et al.  Comparing Check-All and Forced-Choice Question Formats in Web Surveys , 2006 .

[12]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  A NEW SIGNIFICANCE TEST FOR CONSENSUS IN GENERALIZED PROCRUSTES ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[13]  E. Hellinger,et al.  Neue Begründung der Theorie quadratischer Formen von unendlichvielen Veränderlichen. , 1909 .

[14]  L. P. Mccloskey,et al.  DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS FOR WINE QUALITY EXPERTS DETERMINING APPELLATIONS BY CHARDONNAY WINE AROMA , 1996 .

[15]  Q. Mcnemar.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages , 1947, Psychometrika.

[16]  Gastón Ares,et al.  APPLICATION OF TWO CONSUMER PROFILING TECHNIQUES TO COSMETIC EMULSIONS , 2010 .

[17]  Michel Rogeaux,et al.  Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity , 2009 .

[18]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  Comparison of conventional descriptive analysis and a citation frequency-based descriptive method for odor profiling: An application to Burgundy Pinot noir wines , 2010 .

[19]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception , 2010 .

[20]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping® procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire valley , 2008 .

[21]  Kwang Ok Kim,et al.  Comparing the liking for Korean style salad dressings and beverages between US and Korean consumers: Effects of sensory and non-sensory factors , 2012 .

[22]  John C. Castura,et al.  Use of feedback calibration to reduce the training time for wine panels , 2006 .

[23]  Gastón Ares,et al.  CONSUMERS' TEXTURE PERCEPTION OF MILK DESSERTS. II – COMPARISON WITH TRAINED ASSESSORS' DATA , 2012 .

[24]  L. Moio,et al.  A new approach to examine the relationships between sensory and gas chromatography-olfactometry data using Generalized Procrustes analysis applied to six French Chardonnay wines. , 2003, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[25]  G. Hommel.  A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test , 1988 .

[26]  G. Hough,et al.  Free listing: A method to gain initial insight of a food category , 2010 .

[27]  Young-Seung Lee,et al.  The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping , 2010 .

[28]  W. Bredie,et al.  “All-In-One Test” (AI1): A rapid and easily applicable approach to consumer product testing , 2013 .

[29]  Anthony A. Williams,et al.  The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports , 1984 .

[30]  Herbert L. Meiselman,et al.  Measuring emotions associated with foods: Important elements of questionnaire and test design , 2013 .

[31]  Pascal Schlich,et al.  Temporal Dominance of Sensations: What is a good attribute list? , 2012 .

[32]  K. Gabriel,et al.  The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis , 1971 .

[33]  John C. Castura,et al.  Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data , 2013 .

[34]  Sylvie Chollet,et al.  Invited review Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science , 2012 .

[35]  H. Lawless,et al.  Limiting response alternatives in time-intensity scaling: an examination of the halo-dumping effect. , 1994, Chemical senses.

[36]  W. G. Cochran.  The comparison of percentages in matched samples. , 1950, Biometrika.

[37]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Consumers’ texture vocabulary: Results from a free listing study in three Spanish-speaking countries , 2011 .

[38]  C. O. Matthews.  The effect of position of printed response words upon children's answers to questions in two-response types of tests. , 1927 .

[39]  Herbert L. Meiselman,et al.  Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods , 2010 .

[40]  Gastón Ares,et al.  EXTERNAL PREFERENCE MAPPING OF COMMERCIAL ANTIAGING CREAMS BASED ON CONSUMERS' RESPONSES TO A CHECK‐ALL‐THAT‐APPLY QUESTION , 2011 .

[41]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[42]  Dave Plaehn,et al.  CATA penalty/reward , 2012 .

[43]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization , 2013 .