Analyzing sustainability transitions as a shift between socio-metabolic regimes

This essay seeks to specify the theoretical choices and assumptions involved in studying sociometabolic transitions, such as sustainability transitions, in a way that distinguishes them from mere “changes”. These generalizations draw on experiences with the empirical analysis of historical transitions on various scale levels. This perspective is illustrated by using material and energy flow data to demonstrate global sociometabolic regime transitions during the 20th century.

[1]  R. Kemp,et al.  Assessing the Dutch Energy Transition Policy: How Does it Deal with Dilemmas of Managing Transitions? , 2007 .

[2]  Heinz Schandl,et al.  Socio-Ecological Regime Transitions in Austria and the United Kingdom , 2008 .

[3]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Linking social and ecological systems , 2011 .

[4]  John R. McNeill,et al.  Something new under the sun : an environmental history of the twentieth-century world , 2000 .

[5]  S. Gould.  The Structure of Evolutionary Theory , 2002 .

[6]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  A socio‐metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another Great Transformation , 2011 .

[7]  G. Turner.  A comparison of The Limits to Growth with 30 years of reality , 2008 .

[8]  M. Hubbert,et al.  The Energy Resources of The Earth , 1971 .

[9]  Espen Moe,et al.  Energy, industry and politics: Energy, vested interests, and long-term economic growth and development , 2010 .

[10]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Conceptualizing, Observing, and Influencing Social-Ecological Transitions , 2009 .

[11]  Eric J. Chaisson,et al.  Energy in Nature and Society: General Energetics of Complex Systems , 2008 .

[12]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Rolf Peter Sieferle,et al.  The Subterranean Forest: Energy Systems and the Industrial Revolution , 2001 .

[14]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[15]  J. Tainter.  The Collapse of Complex Societies , 1988 .

[16]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[17]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  The Economic Growth Engine: How Energy and Work Drive Material Prosperity , 2009 .

[18]  C. Folke,et al.  Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience , 1998 .

[19]  Doug Nychka,et al.  Development and greenhouse gas emissions deviate from the 'modernization' theory and 'convergence' hypothesis , 2008 .

[20]  J. Diamond.  Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed , 2005 .

[21]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  Technology and global change , 1998 .

[22]  Dagmar Schröter,et al.  Socioecological transitions and global change: trajectories of social metabolism and land use , 2009 .

[23]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  The Energetic Metabolism of Societies Part I: Accounting Concepts , 2001 .

[24]  John R. McNeill,et al.  Something new under the sun : an environmental history of the twentieth century , 2000 .

[25]  E. Boserup.  Population and technology , 1982 .

[26]  J. R. McNeill,et al.  Breaking the Sod: Humankind, History, and Soil , 2004, Science.

[27]  Camilla Sandström,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Understanding Adaptive Capacity in Forest Governance Local Consequences of Applying International Norms: Differences in the Application of Forest Certification in Northern Sweden, Northern Finland, and Northwest Russia , 2009 .

[28]  H. Haberl,et al.  Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century , 2009 .