Temporally weighted average curve number method for daily runoff simulation

The modified Soil Conservation Service curve number (CN) method is widely used in long-term continuous models to predict daily surface runoff. However, it has been shown that this method gives poor results in reproducing peak flows in high rainfall periods. This is because there is an inaccuracy stemming from the model algorithm as it adjusts the daily runoff curve number as a function of soil moisture content at the end of the previous day. This paper proposes an alternative daily based curve number technique that can provide better prediction of daily runoff during the high flow season. The proposed method uses the temporally weighted average curve number (TWA-CN) to estimate daily surface runoff, while considering the effect of rainfall during a given day as well as the antecedent soil moisture condition. To test the applicability of the TWA-CN method, it was incorporated with the long-term, continuous simulation watershed models SWAT and SWAT-G. Simulations were conducted for the Miho River watershed located in the middle of South Korea. The graphical displays and statistics of the determination coefficient (R2) and the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) of the observed and simulated daily runoff indicated that the modified SWAT with the TWA-CN method may provide better runoff prediction (R2 = 0·837, NSE = 0·833) than the original SWAT (R2 = 0·815, NSE = 0·824). Likewise, the determination coefficient (R2 = 0·816) and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE = 0·834) for the modified SWAT-G are also higher than the original version (R2 = 0·782, NSE = 0·825). It is expected that the improved capability in predicting surface runoff using the suggested CN estimate method will provide a sound contribution to the accurate simulations of water yield. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  CREAMS: a field scale model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems [USA] , 1980 .

[2]  D. Overton.  Muskingum flood routing of upland streamflow , 1966 .

[3]  Roger G. Cronshey,et al.  Discussion of “ Antecedent Moisture Condition Probabilities ” by Donald D. Gray, Peter G. Katz, Sharon M. deMonsabert, and Neroli P. Cogo (June, 1982) , 1983 .

[4]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature , 1985 .

[5]  John R. Williams,et al.  Water Yield Model Using SCS Curve Numbers , 1976 .

[6]  Roberto C. Izaurralde,et al.  THE APEX MODEL , 2009 .

[7]  Ray B. Bryant,et al.  Perspectives on the potential for hydropedology to improve watershed modeling of phosphorus loss , 2006 .

[8]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems , 1987 .

[9]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[10]  J. Garbrecht,et al.  HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION OF THE LITTLE WASHITA RIVER EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED USING SWAT 1 , 2003 .

[11]  John R. Williams,et al.  The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history , 1990 .

[12]  Hans-Georg Frede,et al.  SWAT-G, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments , 2002 .

[13]  J. Monteith.  Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[14]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Long‐term hydrological simulation based on the Soil Conservation Service curve number , 2004 .

[15]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[16]  Deva K. Borah,et al.  Storm Event and Continuous Hydrologic Modeling for Comprehensive and Efficient Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[17]  Surendra Kumar Mishra,et al.  SCS-CN method. Part 1: Derivation of SCS-CN -based models , 2002 .

[18]  C. S. Everson,et al.  Modelling streamflow from two small South African experimental catchments using the SWAT model , 2005 .

[19]  R. Young,et al.  AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds , 1989 .

[20]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Development of a continuous soil moisture accounting procedure for curve number methodology and its behaviour with different evapotranspiration methods , 2008 .

[21]  Jimmy R. Williams,et al.  Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: Model description and testing against long-term data , 2006 .

[22]  Nicola Fohrer,et al.  Assessment of the effects of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: development of sustainable land use concepts for low mountain range areas , 2005 .

[23]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Improved Prediction of Storm Runoff in Mountain Watersheds , 1973 .

[24]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  Daily streamflow modelling and assessment based on the curve‐number technique , 2002 .

[25]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[26]  W. Rawls,et al.  EVALUATION OF CURVE NUMBER PROCEDURES TO PREDICT RUNOFF IN GLEAMS 1 , 1997 .

[27]  John R. Williams,et al.  Flood Routing With Variable Travel Time or Variable Storage Coefficients , 1969 .