8. Do we access object manipulability while we categorize? Evidence from reaction time studies
暂无分享,去创建一个
Sandro Rubichi | Anna M. Borghi | Roberto Nicoletti | Claudia Bonfiglioli | Paola Ricciardelli | R. Nicoletti | P. Ricciardelli | C. Bonfiglioli | A. Borghi | S. Rubichi
[1] A. Borghi. Object concepts and action: extracting affordances from objects parts. , 2004, Acta psychologica.
[2] J. Mazziotta,et al. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography , 1994, Nature.
[3] Cindy M. Bukach,et al. Gesturing and Naming , 2003, Psychological science.
[4] R. Klatzky. The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments , 1989 .
[5] T. Shallice,et al. Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .
[6] Dennis R. Proffitt,et al. Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001 .
[7] Olaf B. Paulson,et al. When Action Turns into Words. Activation of Motor-Based Knowledge during Categorization of Manipulable Objects , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[8] Alex M. Andrew,et al. Computation and Cognition: Towards A Foundation for Cognitive Science, by Zenon W. Pylyshyn, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., xxiii + 292 pp., £26.15 , 1985, Robotica.
[9] Sarah H. Creem,et al. Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] Michael A. Arbib,et al. Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping , 1998, Neural Networks.
[11] Z. Pylyshyn. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[12] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[13] L. Buxbaum,et al. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[14] S. Small. The neuroscience of language , 2008, Brain and Language.
[15] L. Lotto,et al. Le figure PD/DPSS. Misure di accordo sul nome, tipicità, familiarità, età di acquisizione e tempi di denominazione per 266 figure , 2001 .
[16] T. Landauer,et al. A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .
[17] M. Jeannerod,et al. Measuring time to awareness , 1991, Neuroreport.
[18] M Gentilucci,et al. Influence of automatic word reading on motor control , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.
[19] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.
[20] Alex Martin,et al. Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.
[21] R. Campbell,et al. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex , 2000, Current Biology.
[22] Christine D. Wilson,et al. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[23] M Poncet,et al. The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[24] Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al. Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science , 1984 .
[25] R. Klatzky,et al. Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[26] M. Brett,et al. Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[27] H. Bekkering,et al. The role of objects in imitation. , 2002 .
[28] Maurizio Gentilucci,et al. Object motor representation and language , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.
[29] G. Lakoff,et al. The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[30] R. Ellis,et al. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.
[32] Matthew T. Keener,et al. Differences in word associations to pictures and words , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[33] A. Borghi. Grounding Cognition: Object Concepts and Action , 2005 .
[34] Saul Sternberg,et al. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .
[35] Laura A. Carlson,et al. Functional Features in Language and Space. , 2004 .
[36] R. Ellis,et al. Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.
[37] Michael P. Kaschak,et al. Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[38] Michael P. Kaschak,et al. Putting words in perspective , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[39] Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al. The Neuroscience of Language: On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order , 2003 .
[40] R. Ellis,et al. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .
[41] G. Humphreys,et al. Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] L. Barsalou,et al. Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[43] R. Ellis,et al. Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.
[44] M. Gentilucci,et al. Language and motor control , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.
[45] Kenny R. Coventry,et al. Seeing, saying and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions , 2004 .
[46] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.
[47] P. Dixon,et al. Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.
[48] Myrna F. Schwartz,et al. Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’ , 2000 .
[49] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. The neural substrates of action retrieval: An examination of semantic and visual routes to action , 2002 .