ULTIMATE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT FOR FIXED STEEL

Currently, more than 80% of Malaysia’s offshore platforms are aged 30-40 years which is beyond the design life of 25 years. Structural assessments are needed to gauge the platforms for the extended use. The two common methods widely used are the simplified ultimate strength analysis and static pushover analysis. Simplified ultimate strength is attained when any of member, joint, pile steel strength and pile soil bearing capacity reaches its ultimate capacity. This is the platform’s ultimate strength. Static pushover analysis generally concentrates on RSR (Reserve Strength Ratio) and RRF (Reserve Resistance Factor) for the ultimate strength. This report summarizes a study of the ultimate strength of jacket platforms designed using API RP2A-WSD 21st Edition (2000) using SACS software with the module for Full Plastic Collapse Analysis. Two types of analyses have been carried out. First the ultimate strength of jacket platform with different number of legs is determined and in the second part the collapse load of platforms for different bracing configuration is studied. The non-linear pushover analysis is done by programming the software to analyze the structure with a set of incremental load until the structure collapses. The non-linear analysis module will distribute the load to alternative load paths available within the jacket framework until the structure collapse or have excessive deformation. In order to cater to uncertainties and distribution of data, several criteria of platform site location, age of service, type of platform, number of legs and other critical-related characteristics were considered. From the first phase of study, it is seen that \ a platform with more legs has higher ultimate strength compared to less number of legs. Hence a bigger jacket platform with eight legs is stiffer than smaller platform. The bracing configuration study shows that the X-bracing contributes highest rigidity to the whole platform by retaining the platform until the highest load compared to other configurations.

[1]  J. Kallaby,et al.  Inelastic Analysis of Fixed Offshore Platforms for Earthquake Loading , 1975 .

[2]  P W Marshall,et al.  FAILURE MODES FOR OFFSHORE PLATFORMS - FATIGUE , 1976 .

[3]  B Skallerud,et al.  REASSESSMENT OF OFFSHORE STEEL STRUCTURES: SHAKEDOWN AND CYCLIC NONLINEAR FEM ANALYSES , 1991 .

[4]  P. S. Tromans,et al.  NONLINEAR RE-ASSESSMENT OF JACKET STRUCTURES UNDER EXTREME STORM CYCLIC LOADING: PART II - REPRESENTATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL LOAD HISTORIES , 1993 .

[5]  O Hellan,et al.  NONLINEAR RE-ASSESSMENT OF JACKET STRUCTURES UNDER EXTREME STORM CYCLIC LOADING: PART IV - CASE STUDIES ON EXISTING NORTH-SEA PLATFORMS , 1993 .

[6]  M. T. Vannan,et al.  AN AUTOMATED PROCEDURE FOR PLATFORM STRENGTH ASSESSMENT , 1994 .

[7]  W. F. Krieger,et al.  Process For Assessment Of Existing Platforms To Determine Their Fitness For Purpose , 1994 .

[8]  Arazi Idrus,et al.  Resistance Parameters Statistics For Jacket Platforms In Offshore Malaysia , 2011 .

[9]  Mohd Shahir Liew,et al.  Reliability Analysis of Tubular Joints of Offshore Platforms in Malaysia , 2011 .

[10]  M. K. M. Akram,et al.  Codewise Classification of Malaysia’s Offshore Platforms , 2011 .

[11]  Zafarullah Nizamani,et al.  Statistical Parameters of Steel Tubular Member Design for Offshore Platforms in Malaysia , 2011 .

[12]  Zafarullah Nizamani,et al.  Selection of Environmental Parameters for Offshore Jacket Platform Design in Malaysia , 2011 .

[13]  Mohd Faris Khamidi,et al.  RISK-BASED ASSESSMENT ON MALAYSIA’S OFFSHORE JACKET PLATFORM , 2012 .

[14]  Arazi Idrus,et al.  Reliability analysis of jacket platforms in Malaysia-environmental load factors , 2012 .

[15]  Mohd Shahir Liew,et al.  Development of Partial Environmental Load Factor for Design of Tubular Joints of Offshore Jacket Platforms in Malaysia , 2013 .