Federal subsidies for health insurance premiums sold through the Marketplaces are tied to the cost of the benchmark plan, the second-lowest-cost silver plan. According to economic theory, the presence of more competitors should lead to lower premiums, implying smaller federal outlays for premium subsidies. The long-term impact of the Affordable Care Act on government spending will depend on the cost of these premium subsidies over time, with insurer participation and the level of competition likely to influence those costs. We studied insurer participation and premiums during the first two years of the Marketplaces. We found that the addition of a single insurer in a county was associated with a 1.2 percent lower premium for the average silver plan and a 3.5 percent lower premium for the benchmark plan in the federally run Marketplaces. We found that the effect of insurer entry was muted after two or three additional entrants. These findings suggest that increased insurer participation in the federally run Marketplaces reduces federal payments for premium subsidies.
[1]
Leemore S. Dafny,et al.
More Insurers Lower Premiums: Evidence from Initial Pricing in the Health Insurance Marketplaces
,
2014,
American Journal of Health Economics.
[2]
Leemore S. Dafny.
Are Health Insurance Markets Competitive ? A Test of Direct Price Discrimination
,
2007
.
[3]
A. Hillman,et al.
Competitive behavior in the HMO marketplace.
,
2002,
Health affairs.
[4]
Leemore S. Dafny,et al.
Paying a Premium on Your Premium? Consolidation in the U.S. Health Insurance Industry
,
2009,
The American economic review.
[5]
A. Enthoven.
Managed competition: an agenda for action.
,
1988,
Health affairs.
[6]
B. Herring,et al.
How do health insurer market concentration and bargaining power with hospitals affect health insurance premiums?
,
2014,
Journal of health economics.