Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.
[2] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.
[3] D. Balota,et al. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.
[4] C. Clifton,et al. Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[5] Ralf Engbert,et al. The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model , 2012, Visual cognition.
[6] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[7] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of "intelligent" eye-movement behavior during reading. , 2006, Psychological review.
[8] K. Rayner. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[9] Jukka Hyönä,et al. Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? , 2004 .
[10] Dario D. Salvucci. An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.
[11] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] Suiping Wang,et al. Is preview benefit from word n + 2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements , 2012, Reading and writing.
[13] Keith Rayner,et al. Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] K. Rayner,et al. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .
[15] J. H. Bertera,et al. The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.
[16] Keith Rayner,et al. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] Ralph Radach,et al. Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[19] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. A Theoretical Analysis of the Perceptual Span based on SWIFT Simulations of the n + 2 Boundary Paradigm , 2014, Visual cognition.
[20] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[21] R. Kliegl,et al. Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[22] D. Balota,et al. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.
[23] W. Nelson Francis,et al. FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .
[24] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Serial-attention models of reading , 2011 .
[25] R. Burchfield. Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .
[26] Wilson L. Taylor,et al. “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .
[27] Keith Rayner,et al. Semantic preview benefit in reading English: The effect of initial letter capitalization. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] Ralf Engbert,et al. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.
[29] Ralf Engbert,et al. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading , 2004 .
[30] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[31] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[32] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[33] Eyal M. Reingold,et al. Neurophysiological constraints on the eye-mind link , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[34] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Semantic preview benefit during reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[35] R. Kliegl,et al. Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. , 2011, Psychology and aging.
[36] Keith Rayner,et al. Parafoveal processing in reading , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[37] Jinmian Yang,et al. Preview effects of plausibility and character order in reading Chinese transposed words: evidence from eye movements , 2013 .
[38] J. Henderson,et al. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[39] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[40] Elizabeth R Schotter,et al. Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[41] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[42] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[43] Sarah J. White,et al. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[44] Suiping Wang,et al. Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading , 2012, Reading and writing.
[45] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Parallel graded attention models of reading , 2011 .
[47] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: a unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. , 2012, Psychological review.
[48] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously , 2008, Visual cognition.
[49] Erik D. Reichle,et al. The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[50] R. Levy,et al. The utility of modelling word identification from visual input within models of eye movements in reading , 2012, Visual cognition.
[51] Keith Rayner,et al. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[52] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[53] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading: Models and data , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[54] K. Rayner. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[55] Denis Drieghe,et al. How fast can predictability influence word skipping during reading? , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[56] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[57] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[58] Scott A McDonald,et al. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal , 2006, Vision Research.
[59] D. Zola. Redundancy and word perception during reading , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[60] K. Rayner,et al. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[61] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements and word skipping during reading: effects of word length and predictability. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.