Age group differences in performance using diverse input modalities: insertion task evaluation

Novel input modalities such as touch, tangibles or gestures try to exploit human's innate skills rather than imposing new learning processes. However, no work has been reported that systematically evaluates how these interfaces influence users' performance, that is, assesses if one interface can be more or less appropriate for interaction regarding: (1) different age groups; and (2) different basic tasks, as content insertion or manipulation. This work presents itself as an exploratory evaluation about whether or not the users' efficiency is indeed influenced by different input modalities and age. We conducted a usability evaluation with 60 subjects to understand how different interfaces may influence the speed and accuracy of three specific age groups (children, young adults and older-adults) when dealing with a basic content insertion task. Four input modalities were considered to perform the task (keyboard, touch, tangibles and gestures) and the methodology was based on usability testing (speed, accuracy and user preference). Overall, results show that there is a statistically significant difference in speed of task completion between the age groups, and there may be indications that the type of interface that is used can indeed influence efficiency in insertion tasks, and not so much other factors like age. Also, the study raises new issues regarding the "old" mouse input versus the "new" input modalities.

[1]  A BowmanDoug,et al.  An Introduction to 3-D User Interface Design , 2001 .

[2]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input , 2013, CHI.

[3]  Wilbert O. Galitz,et al.  The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques , 1996 .

[4]  H. Beyer Tukey, John W.: Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company Reading, Mass. — Menlo Park, Cal., London, Amsterdam, Don Mills, Ontario, Sydney 1977, XVI, 688 S. , 1981 .

[5]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[6]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: an application of the steering law , 1999, CHI '99.

[7]  Judy Kay,et al.  Multi-touch technology in a higher-education classroom: lessons in-the-wild , 2014, OZCHI.

[8]  Roel Vertegaal Session details: Attentive user interfaces , 2003 .

[9]  Yaofeng Xue,et al.  An exploration of developing multi-touch virtual learning tools for young children , 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer.

[10]  Markku Tukiainen,et al.  A method to study visual attention aspects of collaboration: eye-tracking pair programmers simultaneously , 2008, ETRA.

[11]  Jun Hu,et al.  Breathe with Touch: A Tactile Interface for Breathing Assistance System , 2015, INTERACT.

[12]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  `Connecting' to the information society: a European perspective , 1999 .

[13]  Richard B. Reilly Applications of face and gesture recognition for human-computer interaction , 1998, MULTIMEDIA '98.

[14]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Tablet, gestures, remote control?: influence of age on performance and user experience with iTV applications , 2014, TVX.

[15]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Multitouch tablet applications and activities to enhance the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorders , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Perceptual user interfaces: multimodal interfaces that process what comes naturally , 2000, CACM.

[17]  Carlos Guedes,et al.  New Interaction Paradigms to Fight the Digital Divide: A Pilot Case Study Regarding Multi-Touch Technology , 2012, DSAI.

[18]  Thad Starner,et al.  A gesture-based american sign language game for deaf children , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Klaus Krippendorff Human-Centeredness: A Paradigm Shift Invoked by the Emerging Cyberspaces , 1997 .

[20]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Experimental evaluation of vision and speech based multimodal interfaces , 2001, PUI '01.

[21]  Arnold M. Lund,et al.  The future of natural user interfaces , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  D. C. M. Carvalho,et al.  Interaction Paradigms Versus Age-Related User Profiles: an Evaluation on Content Selection , 2015, IEEE Latin America Transactions.

[23]  Bozena Kostek,et al.  Gesture-based computer control system applied to the interactive whiteboard , 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Information Technology, (2010 ICIT).

[24]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  An Introduction to 3-D User Interface Design , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[25]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch , 2007, CHI.

[26]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[27]  Andries van Dam,et al.  Post-WIMP user interfaces , 1997, CACM.

[28]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Noncommand user interfaces , 1993, CACM.

[29]  D. Hoaglin,et al.  Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling , 1987 .

[30]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  An agenda for human-computer interaction: science and engineering serving human needs , 1991, SGCH.

[31]  Luís Magalhães,et al.  Different interaction paradigms for different user groups: an evaluation regarding content selection , 2014, Interacción '14.

[32]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  User Interfaces for All: New Perspectives into Human- Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[33]  Jeroen Lievens,et al.  TOUCH TEACH LEARN. UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF TOUCH ENABLED MOBILE DEVICES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION , 2015 .

[34]  Brett Wilkinson,et al.  Comparison of gestural, touch, and mouse interaction with Fitts' law , 2013, OZCHI.

[35]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Age-related differences in pointing movements in restricted visual tasks and their design implication , 2013, 2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering.

[36]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  Attentive User Interfaces , 2003 .

[37]  Beatrix Vereijken,et al.  Designing Smart Home Technology for Fall Prevention in Older People , 2014, HCI.