Assessment of Pharmacologic Area Under the Curve When Baselines are Variable

ABSTRACTPurposeThe area under the curve (AUC) is commonly used to assess the extent of exposure of a drug. The same concept can be applied to generally assess pharmacodynamic responses and the deviation of a signal from its baseline value. When the initial condition for the response of interest is not zero, there is uncertainty in the true value of the baseline measurement. This necessitates the consideration of the AUC relative to baseline to account for this inherent uncertainty and variability in baseline measurements.MethodsAn algorithm to calculate the AUC with respect to a variable baseline is developed by comparing the AUC of the response curve with the AUC of the baseline while taking into account uncertainty in both measurements. Furthermore, positive and negative components of AUC (above and below baseline) are calculated separately to allow for the identification of biphasic responses.ResultsThis algorithm is applied to gene expression data to illustrate its ability to capture transcriptional responses to a drug that deviate from baseline and to synthetic data to quantitatively test its performance.ConclusionsThe variable nature of the baseline is an important aspect to consider when calculating the AUC.

[1]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. John Bailer,et al.  Testing for the equality of area under the curves when using destructive measurement techniques , 1988, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[3]  Jeffrey T. Leek,et al.  EDGE: extraction and analysis of differential gene expression , 2006, Bioinform..

[4]  Michal Linial,et al.  Novel Unsupervised Feature Filtering of Biological Data , 2006, ISMB.

[5]  W J Jusko,et al.  Integrated functions for four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic response. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[6]  J. Yuan,et al.  Estimation of variance for AUC in animal studies. , 1993, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  Younggil Kwon,et al.  Handbook of Essential Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug Metabolism for Industrial Scientists , 2001, Springer US.

[8]  P. Bonate Coverage and Precision of Confidence Intervals for Area Under the Curve Using Parametric and Non-parametric Methods in a Toxicokinetic Experimental Design , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.

[9]  H. Mager,et al.  Resampling methods in sparse sampling situations in preclinical pharmacokinetic studies. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[10]  Dennis B. Troup,et al.  NCBI GEO: archive for high-throughput functional genomic data , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in DNA microarrays. , 2003, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  Ziv Bar-Joseph,et al.  STEM: a tool for the analysis of short time series gene expression data , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[13]  Martin J. Wolfsegger,et al.  Establishing Bioequivalence in Serial Sacrifice Designs , 2007, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[14]  W J Jusko,et al.  Precursor-dependent indirect pharmacodynamic response model for tolerance and rebound phenomena. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[15]  Thomas Jaki,et al.  Confidence intervals for ratios of AUCs in the case of serial sampling: a comparison of seven methods , 2009, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[16]  Jin Y. Jin,et al.  Modeling of Corticosteroid Pharmacogenomics in Rat Liver Using Gene Microarrays , 2003, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[17]  W. Jusko,et al.  Characterization of Pharmacodynamic Recession Slopes for Direct and Indirect Response Models , 1998, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[18]  Thomas Jaki,et al.  Estimation of AUC from 0 to Infinity in Serial Sacrifice Designs , 2005, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[19]  William J. Jusko,et al.  Methods of utilizing baseline values for indirect response models , 2009, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.