The Nominal Group Technique: extending the evaluation of students' teaching and learning experiences

ABSTRACT Obtaining and evaluating student opinion about their teaching and learning experiences can, if taken seriously, be a complex process. There are not many approaches available for student evaluations, and there has in our view, been an over dependence on course evaluation questionnaires. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a less widely used approach, which this paper argues provides a potential way of extending the evaluation of students' experiences of courses. The paper specifically considers the use of the NGT in the context of an evaluation of the first three cohorts of students on a new degree course. The strengths and weaknesses of the approach as they have emerged in this evaluation are considered. Attention is also paid to evidence concerning the use of the NGT in other contexts. The paper concludes that the NGT has much to offer within the portfolio of student evaluation methods currently being used in higher education. Its particular strengths are assessed in relation to certain possibl...

[1]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[2]  Kae H. Chung,et al.  An Inquiry of The Nominal Group Process , 1971 .

[3]  André L. Delbecq,et al.  A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning , 1971 .

[4]  Van de Ven,et al.  Group decision making and effectiveness: An experimental study , 1974 .

[5]  H. William Vroman.  An Application of the Nominal Group Technique in Educational Systems Analysis. , 1975 .

[6]  Thad B. Green,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Nominal and Interacting Groups , 1975 .

[7]  V Holtz,et al.  Planning for meaningful change in libraries and library networks: a first step. , 1976, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[8]  The Nominal Group: A New Tool for Making Social Work Education Relevant , 1977 .

[9]  Nominal Grouping Applied to the Motivation of Educational Secretaries and Administrative Assistants. , 1977 .

[10]  Elizabeth H. Hegarty.  The Problem Identification Phase of Curriculum Deliberation: Use of the Nominal Group Technique∗ , 1977 .

[11]  Brooke B. Collison,et al.  Facilitative and Inhibitive Implications of Developing a Career Education Program. , 1978 .

[12]  Larry E. Penley,et al.  Structuring a Group's Communication for Improved Problem-Solving , 1978 .

[13]  Teacher versus Administrator: A Growing Crisis. , 1978 .

[14]  Curriculum Development and the Nominal Group Technique: Gaining the Practitioners' View , 1979 .

[15]  David M. Hopkins.  Improving MBO through Synergistics , 1979 .

[16]  Mary James,et al.  Curriculum Evaluation in Schools , 1983 .

[17]  M. J. O'neil,et al.  Nominal Group Technique: A process for initiating curriculum development in higher education , 1983 .

[18]  Pamela Lomax,et al.  The uses and abuses of nominal group technique in polytechnic course evaluation , 1984 .

[19]  Lawrence W. Hugenberg,et al.  Identifying Critical Issue Speech Topics Utilizing the Nominal Group Technique. , 1987 .

[20]  A system for assessing the learning needs of registered nurses. , 1988, Journal of continuing education in nursing.

[21]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[22]  Student-controlled evaluation--a pilot study. , 1991, Nurse education today.

[23]  Brian Wilcox,et al.  Time-Constrained Evaluation: A Practical Approach for LEAs and Schools , 1991 .

[24]  E. House.  Realism in Research , 1991 .

[25]  Bill Wood,et al.  Modeling Artistic Creativity: An Empirical Study , 1992 .

[26]  Student Feedback - Context, Issues and Practice , 1992 .

[27]  C. Tanner,et al.  Evaluating teaching effectiveness. , 1995, The Journal of nursing education.