Simultaneous Interpretation: A Hypothetical Model and its Practical Application

Research on simultaneous interpretation (SI) may be said to be in what Kuhn (1970) described as the pre-paradigm stage. According to Kuhn the invention of different models is one of the characteristics of such a period, since more than one theoretical construction can always be placed upon a given collection of data. Empirical research to date has been well reviewed by Gerver (1976), whose model of SI attempts to account for the data so far collected. The presentation of another model of SI may thus be seen as one of the consequences of the varied nature of research during the pre-paradigm period, since no model ever solves all the problems it defines and no two models leave all the same problems unsolved. Therefore, models need not even be in conflict with each other. As each of them usually emphasizes different aspects of the problem under investigation, they may potentially even complement each other. The tentative description of SI offered in this paper should thus be regarded as only one of a host of possible alternatives. My training and on-the-job experience as an interpreter may very well have prevented me from seeing and integrating various important aspects of the process into this model, a fact for which I would like to apologize in advance.

[1]  James D. McCawley,et al.  Where do noun phrases come from , 1969 .

[2]  H C Barik,et al.  Simultaneous Interpretation: Qualitative and Linguistic Data , 1975, Language and speech.

[3]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation , 1969 .

[4]  C. Perfetti Psychosemantics: Some cognitive aspects of structural meaning. , 1972 .

[5]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Language and Information Processing , 1975 .

[6]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Memory for tacit implications of sentences , 1973 .

[7]  Allan Collins,et al.  How to make a language user. , 1972 .

[8]  D. Terence Langendoen,et al.  Studies in linguistic semantics , 1979 .

[9]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[10]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[11]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[12]  G. Miller Some psychological studies of grammar. , 1962 .

[13]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A process model for long-term memory. , 1972 .

[14]  E. Tulving,et al.  Organization of memory. , 1973 .

[15]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .

[16]  Leon A. Jakobovits,et al.  Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology , 1971 .

[17]  D. Massaro Experimental psychology and information processing , 1975 .

[18]  J. McCawley English as a VSO Language , 1970 .

[19]  D Gerver,et al.  Simultaneous Listening and Speaking and Retention of Prose , 1974, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[21]  Kenneth B. Solberg,et al.  Linguistic Theory and Information Processing , 1975 .

[22]  H. Barik Simultaneous Interpretation: Temporal and Quantitative Data , 1973, Language and speech.

[23]  Klaus F. Riegel SOME THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF BILINGUAL DEVELOPMENT1 , 1968 .

[24]  Frieda Goldman-Eisler,et al.  Segmentation of input in simultaneous translation , 1972, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[25]  D R Olson,et al.  Language and thought: aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. , 1970, Psychological review.

[26]  D. Dooling,et al.  Locus of thematic effects in retention of prose. , 1973 .

[27]  George Lakoff,et al.  On Generative Semantics , 1969 .

[28]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding , 1972 .