The Root of Flowering Plants and Total Evidence.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Liang Liu,et al. Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister to water lilies. , 2014, Systematic biology.
[2] Thomas K. F. Wong,et al. Mixture models of nucleotide sequence evolution that account for heterogeneity in the substitution process across sites and across lineages. , 2014, Systematic biology.
[3] E. Cooper. Overly simplistic substitution models obscure green plant phylogeny. , 2014, Trends in plant science.
[4] Z. Kfir. Points of View , 2014, Leonardo.
[5] Matthew A. Gitzendanner,et al. Another look at the root of the angiosperms reveals a familiar tale. , 2014, Systematic biology.
[6] Elchanan Mossel,et al. Identifiability and inference of non-parametric rates-across-sites models on large-scale phylogenies , 2011, Journal of mathematical biology.
[7] R. A. Atherton,et al. The evolutionary root of flowering plants. , 2013, Systematic biology.
[8] Hervé Philippe,et al. Origin of land plants revisited in the light of sequence contamination and missing data , 2012, Current Biology.
[9] K. Peterson,et al. Resolving phylogenetic signal from noise when divergence is rapid: a new look at the old problem of echinoderm class relationships. , 2012, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[10] Carla A. Cummins,et al. A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases. , 2011, Systematic biology.
[11] Claude W. dePamphilis,et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms , 2011, Nature.
[12] D. E. Soltis,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. , 2011, American journal of botany.
[13] Andrew J. Heidel,et al. Origin of land plants: Do conjugating green algae hold the key? , 2011, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[14] C. Delwiche,et al. Multigene Phylogeny of the Green Lineage Reveals the Origin and Diversification of Land Plants , 2010, Current Biology.
[15] Y. Qiu,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes , 2010 .
[16] V. Goremykin,et al. Automated Removal of Noisy Data in Phylogenomic Analyses , 2010, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[17] J. Townsend,et al. Optimal selection of gene and ingroup taxon sampling for resolving phylogenetic relationships. , 2010, Systematic biology.
[18] J. G. Burleigh,et al. Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[19] Davide Pisani,et al. Phylogenetic-signal dissection of nuclear housekeeping genes supports the paraphyly of sponges and the monophyly of Eumetazoa. , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.
[20] R. Viola,et al. Removal of Noisy Characters from Chloroplast Genome-Scale Data Suggests Revision of Phylogenetic Placements of Amborella and Ceratophyllum , 2009, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[21] S. Graham,et al. Different gymnosperm outgroups have (mostly) congruent signal regarding the root of flowering plant phylogeny. , 2009, American journal of botany.
[22] Andrey V. Mardanov,et al. Complete Sequence of the Duckweed (Lemna minor) Chloroplast Genome: Structural Organization and Phylogenetic Relationships to Other Angiosperms , 2008, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[23] H. Philippe,et al. Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[24] James Leebens-Mack,et al. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[25] Pamela S Soltis,et al. Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[26] T. Massingham,et al. Experimental design criteria in phylogenetics: where to add taxa. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[27] Chung-Shien Wu,et al. Chloroplast genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp protein-coding genes of Gnetum parvifolium: insights into cpDNA evolution and phylogeny of extant seed plants. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.
[28] Naiara Rodríguez-Ezpeleta,et al. Detecting and overcoming systematic errors in genome-scale phylogenies. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[29] P. Lockhart,et al. Deciphering ancient rapid radiations. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[30] Jeffrey P Townsend,et al. Profiling phylogenetic informativeness. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[31] Rob DeSalle,et al. How many genes should a systematist sample? Conflicting insights from a phylogenomic matrix characterized by replicated incongruence. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[32] J. Gordon Burleigh,et al. Assessing Systematic Error in the Inference of Seed Plant Phylogeny , 2007, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[33] Elchanan Mossel,et al. How much can evolved characters tell us about the tree that generated them? , 2004, Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny.
[34] R. Jansen,et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck var 'Ridge Pineapple': organization and phylogenetic relationships to other angiosperms , 2006, BMC Plant Biology.
[35] Faisal Ababneh,et al. Matched-pairs tests of homogeneity with applications to homologous nucleotide sequences , 2006, Bioinform..
[36] F. Delsuc,et al. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[37] Chung-Yen Lin,et al. The chloroplast genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): comparative analysis of evolutionary rate with that of grasses and its phylogenetic implications. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[38] A. White,et al. Reconstructing the basal angiosperm phylogeny: evaluating information content of mitochondrial genes , 2006 .
[39] Andrew Rambaut,et al. Heterotachy and tree building: a case study with plastids and eubacteria. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[40] Andrew J. Alverson,et al. Phylogenetic analyses of Vitis (Vitaceae) based on complete chloroplast genome sequences: effects of taxon sampling and phylogenetic methods on resolving relationships among rosids , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[41] M. Steel,et al. A tale of two processes. , 2005, Systematic biology.
[42] R. Gutell,et al. Phylogenetic Analyses of Basal Angiosperms Based on Nine Plastid, Mitochondrial, and Nuclear Genes , 2005, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[43] Bryan Kolaczkowski,et al. No magic pill for phylogenetic error. , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[44] Jim Leebens-Mack,et al. Identifying the basal angiosperm node in chloroplast genome phylogenies: sampling one's way out of the Felsenstein zone. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[45] Edward Susko,et al. Likelihood, parsimony, and heterogeneous evolution. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[46] F. Delsuc,et al. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[47] J. G. Burleigh,et al. Covarion structure in plastid genome evolution: a new statistical test. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[48] P. Waddell,et al. Measuring the fit of sequence data to phylogenetic model: allowing for missing data. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[49] G. Serio,et al. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[50] Davide Pisani,et al. Identifying and removing fast-evolving sites using compatibility analysis: an example from the Arthropoda. , 2004, Systematic biology.
[51] Bryan Kolaczkowski,et al. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous , 2004, Nature.
[52] Michael P. Cummings,et al. PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .
[53] Pamela S Soltis,et al. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. , 2004, Trends in plant science.
[54] J. Palmer,et al. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[55] M. Schwarz,et al. Molecular phylogenetics of the allodapine bee genus Braunsapis: A-T bias and heterogeneous substitution parameters. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[56] Wen-Hsiung Li,et al. Dating the Monocot–Dicot Divergence and the Origin of Core Eudicots Using Whole Chloroplast Genomes , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[57] C. Neinhuis,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. , 2003, American journal of botany.
[58] S. Carroll,et al. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies , 2003, Nature.
[59] V. Goremykin,et al. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that amborella is not a basal angiosperm. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.
[60] S. Poe. Evaluation of the strategy of long-branch subdivision to improve the accuracy of phylogenetic methods. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[61] M. Donoghue,et al. The root of the angiosperms revisited , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[62] James Lyons-Weiler,et al. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[63] D. Soltis,et al. Basal Lineages of Angiosperms: Relationships and Implications for Floral Evolution , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[64] W. Martin,et al. Phylogeny of 33 ribosomal and six other proteins encoded in an ancient gene cluster that is conserved across prokaryotic genomes: influence of excluding poorly alignable sites from analysis. , 2000, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.
[65] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[66] J. Palmer,et al. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[67] M. P. Cummings,et al. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .
[68] Hervé Philippe,et al. The Root of the Tree of Life in the Light of the Covarion Model , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[69] H. Philippe,et al. Archaea sister group of Bacteria? Indications from tree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[70] E. Herniou,et al. Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian Metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. , 1999, Science.
[71] J. Farris,et al. Homoplasy Increases Phylogenetic Structure , 1999 .
[72] W. Doolittle,et al. Microsporidia are related to Fungi: evidence from the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and other proteins. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[73] Nick Goldman,et al. Phylogenetic information and experimental design in molecular systematics , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[74] A. Graybeal,et al. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? , 1998, Systematic biology.
[75] Joseph T. Chang,et al. Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: identifiability and consistency. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.
[76] Joseph T. Chang,et al. Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.
[77] D Penny,et al. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: the problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[78] W. Martin,et al. Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support gnetalean affinities of angiosperms. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.
[79] D Penny,et al. A frequency-dependent significance test for parsimony. , 1995, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[80] M. Steel,et al. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[81] M. A. Steel,et al. Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data , 1993, Nature.
[82] Masami Hasegawa,et al. Ribosomal RNA trees misleading? , 1993, Nature.
[83] D Penny,et al. Progress with methods for constructing evolutionary trees. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[84] A. Kluge. A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes) , 1989 .
[85] H. Jeffreys. Logical Foundations of Probability , 1952, Nature.