Optimal sizing and placement of piezo-actuators for active flutter suppression

The purpose of this work is to design an active control system for flutter suppression of a laminated plate wing model using segmented piezo-actuators. We describe investigations pertaining to the optimal size, thickness and locations of piezo-actuators on a laminated plate-wing structure for flutter suppression. The analysis for the laminated composite wing model is conducted by the Ritz solution technique, which represents the displacement on the plate in terms of power series in spanwise and chordwise directions. The active control system design for flutter suppression requires the equation of motion to be expressed in a linear time-invariant state-space form. The doublet-lattice method is used to compute unsteady aerodynamic forces, which are approximated as the transfer functions of the Laplace variable by the minimum-state method combined with an optimization technique. To design the control system, linear quadratic regulator theory with output feedback is considered in this study. The feedback control gains are obtained by solving coupled nonlinear matrix equations via numerical optimization routines. The optimal geometry of piezo-actuators which minimizes the control performance index is determined by the optimization technique referred to as the sequential linear programming method. The numerical result shows a substantial saving in control effort compared with the initial model.

[1]  E. Crawley,et al.  Use of piezoelectric actuators as elements of intelligent structures , 1987 .

[2]  G. N. Vanderplaats,et al.  ADS: A FORTRAN program for automated design synthesis: Version 1.10 , 1984 .

[3]  Mordechay Karpel,et al.  Application of aeroservoelastic modeling using minimum-state unsteady aerodynamic approximations , 1991 .

[4]  W. Rodden,et al.  A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. , 1969 .

[5]  T. A. Weisshaar,et al.  Static aeroelastic behavior of an adaptive laminated piezoelectric composite wing , 1990 .

[6]  Kenneth B. Lazarus,et al.  Induced strain actuation of isotropic and anisotropic plates , 1991 .

[7]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Effect of adaptive material properties on static aeroelastic control , 1992 .

[8]  A. Suleman,et al.  Flutter control of an adaptive composite panel , 1994 .

[9]  Edward Crawley,et al.  Towards optimal aeroelastic control using elastic and induced strain anisotropy , 1994 .

[10]  Mordechay Karpel.  Design for Active Flutter Suppression and Gust Alleviation Using State-Space Aeroelastic Modeling , 1982 .

[11]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[12]  A. Calise,et al.  Convergence of a numerical algorithm for calculating optimal output feedback gains , 1985 .

[13]  Gerald S. Mueller,et al.  Optimal output feedback by gradient methods with optimal stepsize adjustment , 1979 .

[14]  C. Ham,et al.  Active flutter suppression of composite plate with piezoelectric actuators , 1994 .

[15]  P. Hajela,et al.  Application of piezoelectric elements in supersonic panel flutter suppression , 1991 .

[16]  Youdan Kim,et al.  Optimal design of composite lifting surface for flutter suppression with piezoelectric actuators , 1995 .

[17]  M. Athans,et al.  On the determination of the optimal constant output feedback gains for linear multivariable systems , 1970 .

[18]  T. A. Weisshaar,et al.  Controlling panel flutter using adaptive materials , 1991 .

[19]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Use of piezo-ceramics as distributed actuators in large space structures , 1985 .

[20]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Fundamental mechanisms of aeroelastic control with control surface and strain actuation , 1991 .

[21]  T. Leeks,et al.  Optimizing induced strain actuators for maximum panel deflection , 1994 .