Fuzzy Algorithm for Group Decision Making With Participants Having Finite Discriminating Abilities

A fuzzy inference-based algorithm with rules using the Nash solution is proposed for group decision making considering the finite discriminating abilities of real decision makers (DMs). It provides a solution that can capture and incorporate the imprecision of real people at declaring their preferences, and hence, it reflects more faithfully the DMs' opinions. The algorithm is applied to a purchase project of a storage area network with two DMs and three options. It shows how the algorithm can provide a unique solution whereas customary crisp methods are either unable to do it or reveal a risk of choosing, in 16.5% of the cases, an option that does not match with the preferences declared by the group of DMs as a whole. The algorithm aims for processes where the options are difficult to evaluate, circumstance that makes clear that human beings cannot provide unreal crisp values, and that the solution changes if preference information is only partially taken.

[1]  Jian Ma,et al.  An optimization approach to multiperson decision making based on different formats of preference information , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[2]  Kiril Tenekedjiev,et al.  Fuzzy Rationality in Quantitative Decision Analysis , 2005, Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics.

[3]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  Resolvability for Imprecise Multiattribute Alternative Selection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[4]  Huang Qian,et al.  Implementation method for voting of neural networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference onComputational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications, 2004. CIMSA..

[5]  Tetsuya Murai,et al.  Multiple-attribute decision making under uncertainty: the evidential reasoning approach revisited , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[6]  Watit Benjapolakul,et al.  Fair-efficient guard bandwidth coefficients selection in call admission control for mobile multimedia communications using game theoretic framework , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[7]  Ross A. Malaga,et al.  A weighted sum genetic algorithm to support multiple-party multiple-objective negotiations , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  E. Rosenbloom A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP , 1997 .

[9]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  New tools for decision analysts , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[10]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  A practical approach to fuzzy utilities comparison in fuzzy multicriteria analysis , 2004, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[11]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  CMNN: Cooperative Modular Neural Networks , 1998, Neurocomputing.

[12]  Mark Klein,et al.  Negotiation algorithms for collaborative design settings , 2003, ISPE CE.

[13]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  Fuzzy Sets in Decision Analysis, Operations Research and Statistics , 2001 .

[14]  Da Ruan,et al.  Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection , 2003, Inf. Sci..

[15]  María Angeles Gil,et al.  Fundamentals and Bayesian analyses of decision problems with fuzzy-valued utilities , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[16]  David Ben-Arieh,et al.  Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[17]  N.D. Nikolova,et al.  Fuzzy rationality in the elicitation of subjective probabilities , 2004, 2004 2nd International IEEE Conference on 'Intelligent Systems'. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04EX791).

[18]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  CMNN: Cooperative Modular Neural Networks for pattern recognition , 1997, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[19]  T. Saaty,et al.  Group decision-making: Head-count versus intensity of preference , 2007 .

[20]  S. Srivastava Negotiation Analysis , 2008 .