Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective

Abstract Critical natural capital (CNC) is commonly defined as that part of the natural environment, which performs important and irreplaceable functions. So far, the challenge to determine the criticality of natural capital (NC) has mainly been taken up by the natural sciences, and the critical functions of nature mainly associated with its life-support and ecological services. Little attention has been paid to the socio-cultural functions of NC and to their values for the health and well being of human societies. The aim of this paper is to encourage a more complete accounting of the critical functions of NC and its associated values, by highlighting the importance of the information functions (health, recreation, amenity, education, heritage, etc.) for the quality and sustainability of human life. It is argued that, despite their immaterial and often intangible nature, these functions provide many, socio–economic benefits, which might be assessed through both qualitative and quantitative valuation methodologies. Integration of ecology, sociology and economics is essential to operationalize the concept of CNC as a tool for more balanced environmental planning and decision making.

[1]  Shekhar Singh.  Planning for Environmental Sustainability , 1993 .

[2]  S. Dodds,et al.  Towards a ‘science of sustainability’: Improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being , 1997 .

[3]  C. Etaugh.  The World of Children , 2019 .

[4]  William C. Sullivan,et al.  Where Does Community Grow? , 1997 .

[5]  G. H. Brundtland.  World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[6]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[7]  B. Norton.  Why Preserve Natural Variety? , 2014 .

[8]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[9]  Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data , 1991 .

[10]  A. Dobson.  Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice , 1998 .

[11]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics , 1989, Journal of Marketing.

[12]  R. Ulrich.  View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. , 1984, Science.

[13]  Timothy P. Duane,et al.  Natural capital and quality of life: a model for evaluating the sustainability of alternative regional development paths , 1999 .

[14]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  EMERGENT COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[15]  R. S. de Groot,et al.  Ecological functions and socio-economic values of critical natural capital as a measure for ecological integrity and environmental health , 1999 .

[16]  D. Pearce,et al.  World without end : economics, environment, and sustainable development - summary , 1993 .

[17]  Harry Aiking,et al.  Indicators for sustainability , 2001 .

[18]  G. Evans,et al.  Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences , 1991 .

[19]  Wilfred Beckerman,et al.  How Would you like your ‘Sustainability’, Sir? Weak or Strong? A Reply to my Critics , 1995, Environmental Values.

[20]  William C. Sullivan,et al.  Transforming Inner-City Landscapes , 1998 .

[21]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[22]  D. D. Groot.  Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making , 1992, Polar Record.

[23]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[24]  Friedrich Hinterberger,et al.  Material flows vs. 'natural capital': What makes an economy sustainable? , 1997 .

[25]  Peter A. Victor,et al.  Indicators of sustainable development: some lessons from capital theory , 1991 .

[26]  M. O'Connor,et al.  The Bouchereau woodland and the transmission of socio-ecological economic value. , 2000 .

[27]  C. Waterton,et al.  Woodland sensibilities:recreational use of woods and forests in contemporary Britain -a report for the Forestry Commission , 1998 .

[28]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Investing in natural capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability. , 1994 .

[29]  M. Jacobs.  Sustainable Development, Capital Substitution and Economic Humility: A Response to Beckerman , 1995, Environmental Values.

[30]  P Ekins,et al.  Making Development Sustainable , 1993 .

[31]  Sabine U. O'Hara,et al.  Discursive ethics in ecosystems valuation and environmental policy , 1996 .

[32]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecological Economics , 1998 .

[33]  Sylvie Faucheux,et al.  Neoclassical Natural Capital Theory and "Weak" Indicators for Sustainability , 1997 .

[34]  P Ekins,et al.  A Framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability , 2005 .

[35]  H. Daly,et al.  Natural Capital and Sustainable Development , 1992 .

[36]  D. Pearce.  Substitution and sustainability: some reflections on Georgescu-Roegen , 1997 .

[37]  John M. Gowdy,et al.  Weak sustainability and viable technologies , 1997 .

[38]  R. Turner.  Sustainable environmental economics and management : principles and practice , 1993 .

[39]  L. Westra,et al.  Implementing ecological integrity : restoring regional and global enivronmental and human health. , 2000 .

[40]  R. Ayres,et al.  Strong versus weak sustainability: Economics, natural sciences, and consilience , 2001 .

[41]  C. Tisdell.  Capital/natural resource substitution:: the debate of Georgescu-Roegen (through Daly) with Solow/Stiglitz , 1997 .

[42]  C. Spash.  The Development of Environmental Thinking in Economics , 1999, Environmental Values.

[43]  A. Vatn.  The Environment as a Commodity , 2000 .