Migration pattern of cemented Exeter short stem in Dorr type A femurs. A prospective radiostereometry study with 2-year follow-up

[1]  G. Hooper,et al.  How do cemented short Exeter stems perform compared with standard-length Exeter stems? The experience of the New Zealand National Joint Registry , 2020, Arthroplasty today.

[2]  P. Pilot,et al.  The Predictive Value of Radiostereometric Analysis for Stem Survival in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Systematic Review , 2014, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[3]  H. Gill,et al.  Ten-year RSA-measured migration of the Exeter femoral stem. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  K. Cashman,et al.  Exeter short stems compared with standard length Exeter stems: experience from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  H. Aro,et al.  Low BMD affects initial stability and delays stem osseointegration in cementless total hip arthroplasty in women , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[7]  E. Valstar,et al.  The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[8]  A. Odgaard,et al.  HIP Translation , cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score ASSESSED AGAINST GENERIC AND DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUESTIONNAIRES , 2012 .

[9]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Bourne,et al.  Randomised controlled trial comparing early migration of two collarless polished cemented stems using radiostereometric analysis. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  H. Gill,et al.  The premature failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus stem: a confirmation of RSA predictions. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  The Cement Mantle in Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2006 .

[13]  E R Valstar,et al.  A new type of model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for solving the occluded marker problem. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  J. Besjakov,et al.  Movement patterns of the C-stem femoral component: an RSA study of 33 primary total hip arthroplasties followed for two years. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  H. Gill,et al.  Influence of stem geometry on the stability of polished tapered cemented femoral stems. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  P. Beaulé,et al.  EBRA-FCA for measurement of migration of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  Gunnar Flivik,et al.  Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[18]  R. Johnsson,et al.  Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stem , 2004 .

[19]  Martin Sundberg,et al.  Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stemA radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 years , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[20]  Y H Chan,et al.  Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. , 2003, Singapore medical journal.

[21]  D. Lester,et al.  Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  M. Krismer,et al.  Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacement. Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  D W Murray,et al.  Cement migration after THR. A comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Migration, Stem Shape, and Surface Finish in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  A. Devitt,et al.  16- to 25-year follow-up study of cemented arthroplasty of the hip in patients aged 50 years or younger. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  M. Freeman,et al.  Early radiological observations may predict the long-term survival of femoral hip prostheses. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. , 1995, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[28]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  A Sarmiento,et al.  The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[31]  L. Dorr,et al.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. , 1993, Bone.

[32]  R. Barrack,et al.  Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[33]  S. S. Olsson,et al.  Clinical and radiological long-term results after Charnley-Müller total hip replacement. A 5 to 10 year follow-up study with special reference to aseptic loosening. , 1981, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.