Mode of acquisition of word meanings: The viability of a theoretical construct

This article examines the reliability and validity of the construct, mode of acquisition (MOA). The MOA of a word denotes the way in which the word's meaning is learned. A word's meaning can be acquired perceptually, linguistically, or by some combination of both. In Experiment 1, 26 student volunteers from third year special education courses rated 566 words, taken from reading texts in elementary school, on MOA. Our findings show that MOA ratings gradually change over grades, shifting from mainly perceptually acquired word meanings in Grade 1 texts to mainly linguistically acquired concepts in Grade 6 texts. In Experiment 2, 34 educational professionals completed a list on MOA, concreteness, or imageability. Judgments on the MOA proved to be different from judgments of concreteness and imageability. We suggest that the increasingly linguistic character of word meanings contribute to explaining some of the reading difficulties of deaf children.

[1]  Furth Hg,et al.  A comparison of reading test norms of deaf and hearing children. , 1966 .

[2]  H. Furth.  A comparison of reading test norms of deaf and hearing children. , 1966, American annals of the deaf.

[3]  Rudolph W. Schulz,et al.  Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronunciability for 329 nouns , 1966 .

[4]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[6]  J. Carroll,et al.  Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns , 1973 .

[7]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[8]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  The validity of age-of-acquisition ratings , 1980 .

[9]  Michael Friendly,et al.  The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words , 1982 .

[10]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming , 1984 .

[11]  Peter V. Paul,et al.  Language and Deafness , 1984 .

[12]  C. M. King,et al.  Reading and deafness , 1985 .

[13]  R. Schreuder,et al.  Semantic activation during recognition of referential words , 1985 .

[14]  Jeanne S. Chall,et al.  Two vocabularies for reading: Recognition and meaning. , 1987 .

[15]  Alfredo Campos.  Imagery, Concreteness, Emotionality, Meaningfulness, and Pleasantness of Words , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  Kate Cain,et al.  Story knowledge and comprehension skill , 1996 .

[17]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[18]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Preventing reading difficulties in young children , 1998 .

[19]  Lisa M. Oakes,et al.  Making Sense of Infant Categorization: Stable Processes and Changing Representations☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[20]  J. Altarriba,et al.  Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[21]  Multiple Approaches to the Study of Word Learning in Children , 1999 .

[22]  G. D. Vooght,et al.  CONCRETENESS AND EMOTIONAL VALENCE RATINGS OF 399 DUTCH NOUNS , 1999 .

[23]  Effects of linguistic and cultural diversity on the development of reading comprehension: a comparative study of Dutch, Turkish, and Moroccan children living in the Netherlands , 1999 .

[24]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Components in Early Second Language Reading and Spelling , 2000 .

[25]  P. Bloom.  How children learn the meanings of words , 2000 .

[26]  C. Snow,et al.  Lexical input as related to children's vocabulary acquisition: effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. , 2001, Developmental psychology.