Seasonal life‐history models for the integrated management of the invasive weed nodding thistle Carduus nutans in Australia

Summary 1 It is widely accepted that combining several control options into integrated pest management strategies is the most effective way to provide long-term suppression of pest populations. However, full factorial field trials of all single and integrated control options for a pest species would be prohibitively expensive and time consuming. Methods to allow triage of the huge array of management options would be of great value in streamlining the decision-making process. 2 We present a seasonally structured, individual-based model, specifically designed to compare and rank detailed management strategies for a noxious pasture weed. The model structure is determined in part by the demographic data available, and in part by the management options under consideration. The case study is for nodding thistle Carduus nutans in Australia. Eight years of demographic data, for more than 8000 mapped plants, were used to parameterize the model, which is age-, size- and density-dependent and incorporates individual variation. Management options for this plant include three biocontrol agents, as well as conventional herbicide and grazing management strategies, which can be used alone or in a variety of combinations. Data on management impacts were drawn from multiple studies. 3 The model predicts that the root-crown weevil Trichosirocalus mortadelo will more effectively suppress weed populations than either of the two flowerhead-feeding insect agents Urophora solstitialis and Rhinocyllus conicus. Crash grazing (up to four times the regular grazing pressure) in any single season, or when most effectively applied across spring and summer, is less effective than T. mortadelo, while combinations of crash grazing and biocontrol agents strongly decrease weed population persistence. However, lethal herbicide is the best single strategy, while spring spray–grazing (a combination of non-lethal herbicide and grazing) is the best integrated weed management strategy. 4 Synthesis and applications. The model is structured by, and serves to integrate, available information on demography and management from multiple sources. The subset of strategies that performed well forms the focus for fewer, more thorough, field trials. The decision-making approach illustrated here is also applicable to any species and any array of management options.

[1]  T. L. Woodburn,et al.  CONTEXT‐DEPENDENT BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF AN INVASIVE THISTLE , 2005 .

[2]  M. Rees,et al.  Biological control of Scotch broom : modelling the determinants of abundance and the potential impact of introduced insect herbivores , 1997 .

[3]  K. Shea Matrix models in population ecology , 1994 .

[4]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[6]  Richard T. Roush,et al.  ACTIVE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT IN INSECT PEST AND WEED CONTROL: INTERVENTION WITH A PLAN FOR LEARNING , 2002 .

[7]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Competing harvesting strategies in a simulated population under uncertainty , 2001 .

[8]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Theory for Biological Control: Recent Developments , 1996 .

[9]  L. Kok,et al.  Dispersal of Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) Seeds , 1984, Weed Science.

[10]  M. Rees,et al.  Large−scale disturbances, biological control and the dynamics of gorse populations , 2001 .

[11]  M. Mangel,et al.  Evolution of Size‐Dependent Flowering in Onopordum illyricum: A Quantitative Assessment of the Role of Stochastic Selection Pressures , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[12]  L. Kok,et al.  Growth responses of musk and plumeless thistles (Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides) to damage by Trichosirocalus horridus (Coleoptera:Curculionidae). , 1985 .

[13]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Interspecific competition between Rhinocyllus conicus and Urophora solstitialis, two biocontrol agents released in Australia against Carduus nutans. , 1996 .

[14]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .

[15]  G. Pearce Weed control in pastures : a practical approach for sheep areas , 1969 .

[16]  J. Waage,et al.  Predictive modelling in biological control : the mango mealy bug (Rastrococcus invadens) and its parasitoids , 1991 .

[17]  M. Julien,et al.  Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds , 1992 .

[18]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Stable coexistence of an invasive plant and biocontrol agent: a parameterized coupled plant-herbivore model , 2005 .

[19]  A. Popay,et al.  Chemical control of nodding thistle (Carduus nutans L.) in New Zealand pastures , 1989 .

[20]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Modelling integrated weed management of an invasive shrub in tropical Australia , 2004 .

[21]  A. Parma What can adaptive management do for our fish, forests, food, and biodiversity? , 1998 .

[22]  Steve W. Adkins,et al.  Climate change and the potential distribution of an invasive alien plant: Acacia nilotica ssp. indica in Australia , 2003 .

[23]  D. T. Briese,et al.  Demography and management of the invasive plant species Hypericum perforatum. II. Construction and use of an individual‐based model to predict population dynamics and the effects of management strategies , 2003 .

[24]  K Shea,et al.  Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Marc Kéry,et al.  Extinction Rate Estimates for Plant Populations in Revisitation Studies: Importance of Detectability , 2004 .

[26]  EVOLUTION IN THE REAL WORLD: STOCHASTIC VARIATION AND THE DETERMINANTS OF FITNESS IN CARLINA VULGARIS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  A. Sheppard,et al.  The demography of Carduus nutans as a native and an alien weed. , 1996 .

[28]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[29]  P. Chesson,et al.  Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions , 2002 .

[30]  A. Sheppard,et al.  Predispersal seed predation on Carduus nutans (Asteraceae) in southern Europe. , 1994 .

[31]  H. S. Jacob,et al.  Biological control of broad-leafed pasture weeds (Paterson's curse, Onopordum and nodding thistles). What have we achieved and where to from here? , 2002 .

[32]  D. Michalk,et al.  Can an integrated management approach provide a basis for long-term prevention of weed dominance in Australian pasture systems? , 2005 .

[33]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management , 2000 .

[34]  D. Briese,et al.  Herbicide management and thistle control - how to avoid resistance. , 1996 .

[35]  M. Alonso-Zarazaga,et al.  Revision of the Trichosirocalus horridus (Panzer) species complex, with description of two new species infesting thistles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Ceutorhynchinae) , 2002 .

[36]  Marc Kéry,et al.  Demographic estimation methods for plants with unobservable life‐states , 2005 .

[37]  Colin J. Thompson,et al.  Expected minimum population size as a measure of threat , 2001 .

[38]  Rupert S. Tipples,et al.  New Zealand , 1927 .

[39]  T. Woodburn Establishment in Australia of Trichosirocalus horridus a Biological Control Agent for Carduus nutans , and Preliminary Assessment of its Impact on Plant Growth and Reproductive Potential , 1997 .

[40]  C. Doyle,et al.  Economics of controlling Carduus nutans on grazed pasture in New Zealand , 1989 .

[41]  Mark Rees,et al.  Interactions between density-dependent processes population dynamics and control of an invasive plant species, Tripleurospermum perforatum (scentless chamomile) , 2001 .

[42]  D. T. Briese,et al.  Demography and management of the invasive plant species Hypericum perforatum. I. Using multi‐level mixed‐effects models for characterizing growth, survival and fecundity in a long‐term data set , 2003 .

[43]  Katriona Shea,et al.  ESTIMATING BIOCONTROL AGENT IMPACT WITH MATRIX MODELS: CARDUUS NUTANS IN NEW ZEALAND , 1998 .

[44]  J. Nechols,et al.  Individual and combined effects of Trichosirocalus horridus and Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on musk thistle , 2004 .