Conserved amino acids participate in the structure networks deputed to intramolecular communication in the lutropin receptor

The luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) particularly susceptible to spontaneous pathogenic gain-of-function mutations. Protein structure network (PSN) analysis on wild-type LHR and two constitutively active mutants, combined with in vitro mutational analysis, served to identify key amino acids that are part of the regulatory network responsible for propagating communication between the extracellular and intracellular poles of the receptor. Highly conserved amino acids in the rhodopsin family GPCRs participate in the protein structural stability as network hubs in both the inactive and active states. Moreover, they behave as the most recurrent nodes in the communication paths between the extracellular and intracellular sides in both functional states with emphasis on the active one. In this respect, non-conservative loss-of-function mutations of these amino acids is expected to impair the most relevant way of communication between activating mutation sites or hormone-binding domain and G protein recognition regions.

[1]  M. Ascoli,et al.  The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective. , 2002, Endocrine reviews.

[2]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Generalized correlation for biomolecular dynamics , 2005, Proteins.

[3]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  Wordom: a program for efficient analysis of molecular dynamics simulations , 2007, Bioinform..

[5]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Structure of a β1-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor , 2008, Nature.

[6]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[7]  Brian K. Kobilka,et al.  Structural Instability of a Constitutively Active G Protein-coupled Receptor , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Manfred Burghammer,et al.  Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  R. Stevens,et al.  High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor. , 2007, Science.

[10]  M. Ascoli,et al.  Effect of activating and inactivating mutations on the phosphorylation and trafficking of the human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor. , 2000, Molecular endocrinology.

[11]  T. Hébert,et al.  A cell surface inactive mutant of the human lutropin receptor (hLHR) attenuates signaling of wild-type or constitutively active receptors via heterodimerization. , 2009, Cellular signalling.

[12]  F. Fanelli,et al.  The Formation of a Salt Bridge Between Helices 3 and 6 Is Responsible for the Constitutive Activity and Lack of Hormone Responsiveness of the Naturally Occurring L457R Mutation of the Human Lutropin Receptor* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Intra and inter-molecular communications through protein structure network. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.

[14]  R. Stevens,et al.  The 2.6 Angstrom Crystal Structure of a Human A2A Adenosine Receptor Bound to an Antagonist , 2008, Science.

[15]  M Karplus,et al.  Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  A. del Sol,et al.  Small‐world network approach to identify key residues in protein–protein interaction , 2004, Proteins.

[17]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  PROTEIN STRUCTURE: INSIGHTS FROM GRAPH THEORY , 2002 .

[18]  C. Brooks,et al.  An implicit membrane generalized born theory for the study of structure, stability, and interactions of membrane proteins. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Patrick Scheerer,et al.  Crystal structure of the ligand-free G-protein-coupled receptor opsin , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Marcus Elstner,et al.  The retinal conformation and its environment in rhodopsin in light of a new 2.2 A crystal structure. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Gil Amitai,et al.  Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  J. Martens,et al.  Insight into mutation-induced activation of the luteinizing hormone receptor: molecular simulations predict the functional behavior of engineered mutants at M398. , 2004, Molecular endocrinology.

[23]  Robert P. Millar,et al.  Functional Microdomains in G-protein-coupled Receptors , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2000, Science.

[25]  F. Fanelli,et al.  A Model for Constitutive Lutropin Receptor Activation Based on Molecular Simulation and Engineered Mutations in Transmembrane Helices 6 and 7* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Contributions of intracellular loops 2 and 3 of the lutropin receptor in Gs coupling. , 2008, Molecular endocrinology.

[27]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Computational modeling approaches to structure-function analysis of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[28]  Functional role of transmembrane helix 7 in the activation of the heptahelical lutropin receptor. , 2000, Molecular endocrinology.

[29]  Krzysztof Palczewski,et al.  Sequence analyses of G-protein-coupled receptors: similarities to rhodopsin. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[30]  D. Puett,et al.  Determining the affinity of hormone-receptor interaction. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[31]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[32]  T. Gudermann,et al.  Requirement of Specific Intrahelical Interactions for Stabilizing the Inactive Conformation of Glycoprotein Hormone Receptors* , 2000, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Oliver P. Ernst,et al.  Crystal structure of opsin in its G-protein-interacting conformation , 2008, Nature.

[34]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  A. Shenker,et al.  An anionic residue at position 564 is important for maintaining the inactive conformation of the human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor. , 1998, Molecular pharmacology.

[36]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[37]  M. Ascoli,et al.  The Gonadotropin Hormones and Their Receptors , 2009 .

[38]  A. Shenker,et al.  The Role of Asp578 in Maintaining the Inactive Conformation of the Human Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  D. Puett,et al.  Identification of amino acid residues in transmembrane helices VI and VII of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor involved in signaling. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[40]  L. Blomberg,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity of constitutively activating mutations of the human luteinizing hormone receptor in familial male-limited precocious puberty. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.