Improving outcomes in upper arm liposuction: adding radiofrequency-assisted liposuction to induce skin contraction.

BACKGROUND Brachioplasty is frequently recommended for patients with more skin laxity than subcutaneous fat. However, many patients are reluctant to accept a visible scar that will affect the activity of the upper arm or clothing choices. Traditional liposuction is effective when minimal skin laxity is present, but the dual problems of postoperative residual skin laxity and unsatisfactory contour irregularities are common when upper arm skin laxity is the chief complaint. OBJECTIVES The author investigates the degree of skin contraction resulting from treatment with radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) and attempts to determine whether, after long-term follow-up, the classification of upper arm deformities and their corresponding treatment protocols can be refined to offer patients with prominent skin laxity an alternative to traditional brachioplasty. METHODS A prospective, institutional review board-approved pilot study was planned with 12 consecutive patients who presented to the author's private clinic for treatment of upper arm laxity. Patients were included only if they were categorized as Stage 2b, 3, or 4 according to the El Khatib and Teimourian system. Based on the "pinch" test and the vertical measurement of skin distal to the bicipital groove as described by El Khatib, a novel caliper was devised to quantify the shortening of the pendulous volar skin. Treatment regions were tattooed prior to surgery and measurements from a Vectra system (Canfield Scientific, Inc., Fairfield, New Jersey) confirmed the preoperative surface area. All patients were treated with the BodyTite device (Invasix, Inc., Yokneam, Israel). No patient underwent skin resection in the volar treatment region. Skin contraction was measured at one year posttreatment. Statistical analysis was conducted with a paired t-test. RESULTS One year after treatment with RFAL, the mean surface area reduction in the volar upper arm region was 33.5% bilaterally. The mean degree of pendulous vertical "hang" shortening was 50% bilaterally. Statistical analysis showed a P value of >.001 for both measurements. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with RFAL achieved statistically significant skin contraction in the upper arm region. Patients in categories 2b and 4 were successfully treated with RFAL instead of traditional brachioplasty (which is recommended by the current classification system). Category 3 patients, however, did require a short-scar brachioplasty procedure to obtain satisfactory results.

[1]  K. Gutowski Evaluation of Skin Tightening After Laser-Assisted Liposuction , 2011 .

[2]  B. Dibernardo Randomized, blinded split abdomen study evaluating skin shrinkage and skin tightening in laser-assisted liposuction versus liposuction control. , 2010, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[3]  M. Paul,et al.  A Safety and Feasibility Study of a Novel Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction Technique , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  B. Dibernardo,et al.  Evaluation of skin tightening after laser-assisted liposuction. , 2009, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[5]  David J Goldberg,et al.  Laser lipolysis of the arm, with and without suction aspiration: Clinical and histologic changes , 2009, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[6]  J. Rubin,et al.  Brachioplasty and Concomitant Procedures after Massive Weight Loss: A Statistical Analysis from a Prospective Registry , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  Hamdy A El Khatib Classification of Brachial Ptosis: Strategy for Treatment , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  J. Marmuse,et al.  Brachioplasty After Massive Weight Loss: A Simple Algorithm for Surgical Plane , 2007, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[9]  P. Andrades,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Laser-Assisted Lipoplasty with Suction-Assisted Lipoplasty , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  An algorithmic approach to upper arm contouring. , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  S. Schlesinger Suction-assisted lipectomy of the upper arm: A four-cannula technique , 1991, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[12]  R. Plaza,et al.  The rationalization of liposuction: Toward a safer and more accurate technique , 1990, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[13]  Y. Illouz Complications de la lipoaspiration , 2004 .

[14]  G. Sattler,et al.  [LipoRepair. Approach to correction of fat tissue deformities]. , 2004, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[15]  M. Salgarello,et al.  MALL liposuction: The natural evolution of subdermal superficial liposuction , 2004, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[16]  M. Gorney Sucking fat: an 18-year statistical and personal retrospective. , 2001, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[17]  P. Lillis Liposuction of the arms. , 1999, Dermatologic clinics.

[18]  P. Fodor,et al.  Personal experience with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a pilot study comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with traditional lipoplasty. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  S. Malekzadeh,et al.  Rejuvenation of the upper arm. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  Maxwell Gp,et al.  Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a clinical study of 250 consecutive patients. , 1998 .

[21]  G. Maxwell,et al.  Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a clinical study of 250 consecutive patients. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  P. Lillis Liposuction of the Arms, Calves, and Ankles , 1997, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[23]  M. D. Gilliland,et al.  CAST Liposuction: An Alternative to Brachioplasty , 1997, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[24]  M. D. Gilliland,et al.  CAST Liposuction of the Arm Improves Aesthetic Results , 1997, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[25]  T. Lockwood Brachioplasty with Superficial Fascial System Suspension , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  Erik Dillerud Suction Lipoplasty: A Report on Complications, Undesired Results, and Patient Satisfaction Based on 3511 Procedures , 1991, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  S. Matarasso A regional approach to patient selection and evaluation for liposuction. , 1990, Dermatologic clinics.

[28]  W. Rogers,et al.  A national survey of complications associated with suction lipectomy: a comparative study. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  R. Dolsky,et al.  Evaluation of 5,458 Cases of Lipo-Suction Surgery , 1986 .

[30]  G. Pitman,et al.  Suction lipectomy: complications and results by survey. , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.