Visually induced motion sickness, visual stress and photosensitive epileptic seizures: what do they have in common? - preface to the special issue.

Prolonged exposure to computer animation can cause undesirable side effects (e.g., the Pokémon incident: Takahashi and Tsukahara (1998) and motion sickness with computer games: de Waard et al., 2003). In 2005, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) published the ISO workshop agreement 3 (IWA 3) that called for more guidelines on image safety. In particular, measures to reduce incidents of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS), visual stress (VS), and photosensitive epileptic seizures (PES) were on the top of the workshop’s agenda. Subsequent to the workshop, both the ISO and the Commission Internationale de ĺEclairage (CIE) have commissioned two technical study groups to draft guidelines concerning the quantification and prevention of VIMS, VS, and PES (ISO/TC159/SC4/SGISO and CIE TC-167: Ujike, 2007). Among the three disorderly conditions, PES is most clearly defined. A PES is an abnormal brain activity triggered by viewing certain visual stimuli. Its symptoms are clearly measurable by EEG recordings and about 1 in 4000 persons in the United Kingdom are susceptible (Harding and Harding, 2007). The type of visual stimuli that will cause PES has been the subject of many studies (see Harding’s article in this special issue) and its understanding has led to the development of an ITC guideline (ITC, 2001). Despite decades of research, VIMS (also known as cinema sickness: Griffin, 1990; cybersickness: McCauley and Sharkey, 1992; vection induced MS: Hettinger et al., 1990; and simulator sickness: Kennedy et al., 1990), the etiology of VIMS is still unknown. It is a condition in which viewers experience symptoms of nausea and eye fatigue during or after viewing visual stimuli with compelling ego-motion inappropriate to their physical body motion (Reason, 1978). Hettinger et al. (1990) reported correlations between levels of vection (illusion of self-motion) and levels of VIMS. They predicted that the VIMS is induced by sensations of vection (illusion of self-motion). Stoffregen and Smart (1998) further predicted that the illusion of self-motion causes postural instability and VIMS is a disorderly condition associated with prolonged postural instability. Stoffregen and his colleagues found that VIMS is preceded by postural instability. Similar to this line of thoughts, Bos and Bles (1998) predicted that VIMS is caused by a kind of disorientation in which ego-motion stimuli promote a subjective sense of vertical axis that is different from the vertical axis aligned with the gravitation force. Bos and Bles (1998) reported that VIMS commonly induced by watching a rotating drum could be eliminated by aligning the drum and

[1]  E Bekiaris,et al.  Human Factors in the Age of Virtual Reality. , 2003 .

[2]  J T Reason,et al.  Motion Sickness Adaptation: A Neural Mismatch Model 1 , 1978, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[3]  D J Heeger,et al.  Model for the extraction of image flow. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  G. Harding,et al.  Photosensitive epilepsy and image safety. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  R. Stern,et al.  Motion sickness and gastric myoelectric activity as a function of speed of rotation of a circular vection drum. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[6]  R. So,et al.  Cybersickness in the presence of scene rotational movements along different axes. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  M. Griffin,et al.  Eye movement, vection, and motion sickness with foveal and peripheral vision. , 2003, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  E. Muth Motion and space sickness: Intestinal and autonomic correlates , 2006, Autonomic Neuroscience.

[9]  Hiroyasu Ujike Estimation of Visually Induced Motion Sickness from Velocity Component of Moving Image , 2009, HCI.

[10]  J. Westfall,et al.  Effects of spatial frequency of a vertically striped rotating drum on vection-induced motion sickness. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[11]  Peter A. Howarth,et al.  Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: Background, theories, and observations , 2008, Displays.

[12]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Postural instability precedes motion sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[13]  A. Wilkins,et al.  Visual Stress and its Treatment with Spectral Filters , 2007 .

[14]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  “Conflicting” Motion Cues to the Visual and Vestibular Self- Motion Systems Around 0.06 Hz Evoke Simulator Sickness , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Michael E. McCauley,et al.  Cybersickness: Perception of Self-Motion in Virtual Environments , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  Takeo Takahashi,et al.  Pocket Monster incident and low luminance visual stimuli: Special reference to deep red flicker stimulation , 1998, Acta paediatrica Japonica : Overseas edition.

[17]  Andy T. K. Ho,et al.  A Metric to Quantify Virtual Scene Movement for the Study of Cybersickness: Definition, Implementation, and Verification , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  S M Ebenholtz,et al.  The possible role of nystagmus in motion sickness: a hypothesis. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[19]  W. Bles,et al.  Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[20]  R. Daroff,et al.  Management of Epilepsy , 1997, Neurology.

[21]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[22]  H W Leibowitz,et al.  The effects of fixation and restricted visual field on vection-induced motion sickness. , 1990, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[23]  Margaret D. Nolan,et al.  Vection and simulator sickness. , 1990, Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association.