Kinematic networks

Motor control in primates relates to a system which is highly redundant from the mechanical point of view — redundancy coming from an imbalance between the set of independently controllable variables and the set of system variables. The consequence is the manifestation of a broad class of ill-posed problems, problems for which it is difficult to identify unique solutions. For example (i) the problem of determining the coordinated patterns of rotation of the arm joints for a planned trajectory of the hand; (ii) the problem of determining the distribution of muscle forces for a desired set of joint torques. Ill-posed problems, in general, require regularization methods which allow to spell acceptable, if not unique, solutions. In the case of the motor system, we propose that the basic regularization mechanism is provided by the potential fields generated by the elastic properties of muscles, according to an organizational principle that we call “Passive Motion Paradigm”. The physiological basis of this hypothesis is reviewed and a “Kinematic Network” (K-net) model is proposed that expresses the kinematic transformations and the causal relations implied by elasticity. Moreover, it is shown how K-nets can be obtained from a kinematic “Body Model”, in the context of a specific task. Two particularly significant results are: (i) the uniform treatment of closed as well as open kinematic chains, and (ii) the development of a new method for the automatic generation of kinematic equations with arbitrary topology. Moreover, the model is akin to the concept of “motor equivalence” in the sense that it provides families of motor equivalent trajectories parametrized by tunable motor impedances.

[1]  H. Cruse Constraints for joint angle control of the human arm , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Oscillation of the human ankle joint in response to applied sinusoidal torque on the foot , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  I. Hunter,et al.  Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with mean ankle torque. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  T. Poggio,et al.  Ill-Posed Problems and Regularization Analysis in Early Vision , 1984 .

[7]  P. Rack,et al.  The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Regulation of multi-joint arm posture and movement. , 1986, Progress in brain research.

[13]  A. Huxley,et al.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Adi Ben-Israel,et al.  Generalized inverses: theory and applications , 1974 .

[15]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The forces generated at the human elbow joint in response to imposed sinusoidal movements of the forearm , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  B. Katz The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction , 1939, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines , 1986 .

[19]  O. Lippold,et al.  The relation between force, velocity and integrated electrical activity in human muscles , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  H. Cruse,et al.  The human arm as a redundant manipulator: The control of path and joint angles , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  J. Soechting,et al.  The mechanical behavior of the human forearm in response to transient perturbations , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  D. Wilkie The relation between force and velocity in human muscle , 1949, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  N. Hogan,et al.  Modularity and Causality in Physical System Modelling , 1987 .

[24]  Paul Smolensky,et al.  Information processing in dynamical systems: foundations of harmony theory , 1986 .

[25]  P. Morasso,et al.  Trajectory formation and handwriting: A computational model , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Giuseppe Marino,et al.  Chapter 4 nem: a language for the representation of motor knowledge , 1986 .

[27]  T. Flash,et al.  The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  G. Zahalak,et al.  A Quantitative Evaluation of the Frequency-Response Characteristics of Active Human Skeletal Muscle In Vivo , 1979 .

[30]  E. C. Kingsley,et al.  A computer aid for man machine modelling , 1981, SIGGRAPH '81.

[31]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.