Increasing reproductive rates of both sexes in dairy cattle breeding optimizes response to selection

It was reasoned that technologies that increase the reproductive rate of males and females in dairy cattle would realize higher responses to selection. The authors tested this hypothesis using deterministic simulation of breeding schemes that resembled those of dairy cattle in Kenya. The response to selection was estimated for four breeding schemes and strategies. Two breeding schemes were simulated, based on artificial insemination (AI) and multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) reproductive technologies. The strategies were defined according to the use of conventional semen (CS) and X-chromosome-sorted semen (XS). The four strategies therefore were AI with CS (AI-CS) and XS (AI-XS), and MOET with CS (MOET-CS) and XS (MOET-XS). The four strategies were simulated based on the current dairy cattle breeding goal in Kenya. A two-tier closed nucleus breeding programme was considered, with 5% of the cows in the nucleus and 95% in the commercial. Dissemination of superior genetic materials in the nucleus was based on all four breeding strategies, while in the commercial only the AI-CS strategy was considered. The strategies that increased the reproductive rates of both males and females (MOET-CS and MOET-XS) realized 2.1, 1.4, and 1.3 times more annual genetic gain, return and profitability per cow, per year, respectively, than strategies that increased the reproductive rates only of males (AI-CS and AI-XS). The use of CS or XS, however, did not affect response to selection in the two schemes. The findings demonstrate that reproductive technologies such as MOET maximize response to selection in dairy cattle breeding. Keywords: artificial insemination, conventional semen, deterministic simulation, multiple ovulation and embryo transfer, X-chromosome-sorted semen

[1]  S. Bauer,et al.  Understanding farmers' preferences for artificial insemination services provided through dairy hubs. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[2]  Fabien Tondel,et al.  Recent developments in the dairy sector in Eastern Africa Towards a regional policy framework for value chain development , 2015 .

[3]  D. Grace,et al.  Beyond milk, meat, and eggs: Role of livestock in food and nutrition security , 2013 .

[4]  Barbara Wieland,et al.  Productivity in different cattle production systems in Kenya , 2013, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[5]  T. Ostersen,et al.  Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[6]  A. C. Sørensen,et al.  Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle breeding programmes: Sexed semen cannot replace multiple ovulation and embryo transfer as superior reproductive technology. , 2012, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[7]  O. Vangen,et al.  A bio-economic model for calculating economic values of traits for intensive and extensive beef cattle breeds , 2012 .

[8]  H. Piepho,et al.  Evaluation of basic and alternative breeding programs for Sahiwal cattle genetic resources in Kenya , 2011 .

[9]  A. C. Sørensen,et al.  Genetic gain in dairy cattle populations is increased using sexed semen in commercial herds. , 2011, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[10]  J. Ojango,et al.  Institutional and organizational frameworks for dairy and beef cattle recording in Kenya: a review and opportunities for improvement , 2011 .

[11]  J. Arendonk The role of reproductive technologies in breeding schemes for livestock populations in developing countries , 2011 .

[12]  H. Piepho,et al.  Genetic and economic evaluation of a basic breeding programme for Kenya Boran cattle , 2010, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[13]  W. Thatcher,et al.  Major advances associated with reproduction in dairy cattle. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  D. Berry,et al.  Cumulative discounted expressions of dairy and beef traits in cattle production systems , 2006 .

[15]  I. Kosgey,et al.  Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programmes in the tropics: a review , 2006 .

[16]  I. Kosgey,et al.  Evaluation of closed adult nucleus multiple ovulation and embryo transfer and conventional progeny testing breeding schemes for milk production in tropical crossbred cattle. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  G. Nitter,et al.  Developing breeding schemes for pasture based dairy production systems in Kenya , 2004 .

[18]  G. Nitter,et al.  Developing breeding schemes for pasture based dairy production systems in Kenya I. Derivation of economic values using profit functions , 2004 .

[19]  P. Bird,et al.  The choice of discount rate in animal breeding investment appraisal. , 1980 .