Effects of Immediate versus Delayed Feedback on Error Detection Accuracy in a Quality Control Simulation

A computer simulation was developed to examine the effects of immediate versus delayed visual feedback on the accuracy of identifying errors (signals) in sample stimuli. In a self-paced computer tutorial, subjects learned to identify particular aberrations in a schematic diagram of a hard disk drive. During experimental sessions, subjects were exposed to a series of 200 samples presented four at a time sequentially on a computer screen, and were required to indicate with a computer mouse whether or not each sample drive contained a signal. Accuracy of signal detection was assessed under four experimental conditions: (1) self-paced, immediate feedback, in which the pace of stimulus presentations was controlled by the subject and the cumulative percentage of correct responses was displayed on the computer screen immediately following each quality control response, (2) self-paced, delayed feedback, in which feedback was displayed only at the end of the session (following completion of the 200th quality contr...

[1]  N. H. Mackworth,et al.  Researches on the Measurement of Human Performance. , 1950 .

[2]  I. J. Saltzman,et al.  Delay of reward and human verbal learning. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Greenspoon,et al.  Effect of delay of knowledge of results on learning a motor task. , 1956, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[4]  I. Bilodeau,et al.  Variation of temporal intervals among critical events in five studies of knowledge of results. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  E A BILODEAU,et al.  A test for interaction of delay of knowledge of results and two types of interpolated activity. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  W. V. Colquhoun THE EFFECT OF ‘UNWANTED’ SIGNALS ON PERFORMANCE IN A VIGILANCE TASK , 1961 .

[7]  F. B. Chaney,et al.  Improving inspector performance through training and visual aids. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  D H Harris,et al.  Effect of defect rate on inspection accuracy. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Douglas H. Harris,et al.  Human factors in quality assurance , 1969 .

[10]  Christine M. Haslegrave,et al.  Industrial Inspection Efficiency and the Probability of a Defect Occurring , 1969 .

[11]  Douglas H. Harris,et al.  The Nature of Industrial Inspection1 , 1969 .

[12]  P. Hanford,et al.  Effects of different delay of reinforcement procedures on variable-interval responding. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  Norman W. Heimstra,et al.  Pacing, Product Complexity, and Task Perception in Simulated Inspection1 , 1975 .

[14]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Human reliability in quality control , 1975 .

[15]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  On Some Statistical Aids Toward Economic Production , 1975 .

[16]  Thomas F. Gilbert,et al.  Human Competence: Engineering Worthy Performance , 1978 .

[17]  Michael McCarthy,et al.  DECREASING THE INCIDENCE OF "HIGH BOBBINS" IN A TEXTILE SPINNING DEPARTMENT THROUGH A GROUP FEEDBACK PROCEDURE , 1978 .

[18]  G Salvendy,et al.  Effects of Personality, Perceptual Difficulty and Pacing of a Task on Productivity, Job Satisfaction, and Physiological Stress , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Bill D. Fortune The Effects of Signal Probability on Inspection Accuracy in a Microscopic Inspection Task: An Experimental Investigation1 , 1979 .

[20]  J. E. Ford,et al.  A Classification System for Feedback Procedures , 1980 .

[21]  F. Andrasik ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION IN BUSINESS SETTINGS , 1980 .

[22]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Industrial safety hazard reduction through performance feedback. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[23]  Mark G. Brown,et al.  Improving Customer Service in a Large Department Store Through the Use of Training and Feedback , 1980 .

[24]  B. L. Hopkins,et al.  An Analysis of the Effects of Feedback and Reinforcement on Machine-Paced Production , 1981 .

[25]  A. Craig Monitoring for One Kind of Signal in the Presence of Another: The Effects of Signal Mix on Detectability , 1981, Human factors.

[26]  J. Fairbank,et al.  Performance feedback in organizational behavior management: A review. , 1981 .

[27]  Dale B Silva,et al.  The Effects of Attendance-Contingent Feedback and Praise on Attendance and Work Efficiency , 1981 .

[28]  Dennis H. Reid,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF SUPERVISOR VERBAL FEEDBACK AND FEEDBACK PLUS APPROVAL ON INSTITUTIONAL STAFF PERFORMANCE , 1981 .

[29]  N Peterson,et al.  Feedback is Not a New Principle of Behavior , 1982, The Behavior analyst.

[30]  J. Komaki,et al.  The role of performance antecedents and consequences in work motivation. , 1982 .

[31]  Richard E. Kopelman Improving productivity through objective feedback: A review of the evidence , 1982 .

[32]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Behavior management in a factory setting: Increasing work efficiency. , 1983 .

[33]  Jagdeep S. Chhokar,et al.  A field study of the effect of feedback frequency on performance , 1984 .

[34]  Terry A. Beehr,et al.  Organizational Behavior Management in the Private Sector: A Review of Empirical Research and Recommendations for Further Investigation , 1985 .

[35]  P. Duncan,et al.  Feedback: Use and Possible Behavioral Functions , 1985 .

[36]  Fabricio E. Balcazar,et al.  A Critical, Objective Review of Performance Feedback , 1985 .

[37]  Donna L Synfelt,et al.  Multipurpose inspection task simulator , 1986 .

[38]  J. Adams Criticisms of Vigilance Research: A Discussion , 1987 .

[39]  E L Wiener,et al.  Application of Vigilance Research: Rare, Medium, or Well Done? , 1987, Human factors.

[40]  M. Colligan,et al.  Machine Pacing and Shiftwork , 1987 .

[41]  Richard M. O'Brien,et al.  Quality Circles, Feedback and Reinforcement , 1988 .

[42]  William K. Redmon,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Process Control, Theory D, and Behavior Analytic Approaches to Quality Control , 1988 .

[43]  Eleanor E. Sanford,et al.  A Methodology and Content Review of Organizational Behavior Management in the Private Sector , 1989 .

[44]  William K. Redmon,et al.  A Daily-Adjusted Goal-Setting and Feedback Procedure for Improving Productivity in a University Admissions Department. , 1990 .

[45]  Gordon O. Henry,et al.  The effects of performance feedback on the implementation of a statistical process control (SPC) program , 1991 .

[46]  Peter Lorenzi,et al.  A Review of Public Posting of Performance Feedback in Work Settings , 1991 .

[47]  Connie J. Wittkopp,et al.  Use of a feedback package to reduce machine set-up time in a manufacturing setting , 1991 .