Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination

Requirements determination (RD) during information systems delivery (ISD) is a complex organizational endeavor, involving political, sensemaking, and communicative processes. This research draws on the analytic concept of technology frames of reference to develop a socio-cognitive process model of how frames and shifts in frame salience influence sensemaking during requirements determination. The model provides a theoretical and conceptual perspective that deepens our understanding of requirements processes in organizations and of the socio-cognitive basis of power in ISD. The paper reports on a longitudinal case study, in which four technology frame domains were identified and the influence of frames on project participants' understanding of requirements was traced through eight RD episodes. Repeated shifts in the salience of the business value of IT and IT delivery strategies frames disrupted project participants' understanding of requirements and contributed to a turbulent RD process. Analysis of frames and framing helped explain how interpretive power was exercised, yet constrained, in this project. Implications for further research and for practice are considered.

[1]  J. Walsh,et al.  The Role of Negotiated Belief Structures in Strategy Making , 1986 .

[2]  Ron Weber,et al.  System designers' user models: a comparitive study and methodological critique , 1983, CACM.

[3]  M. Markus.  The qualitative difference in information systems research and practice , 1997 .

[4]  Pat Fung,et al.  Constructing the Networked Organization: Content and Context in the Development of Electronic Communications , 1995 .

[5]  D. Boje.  The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. , 1991 .

[6]  RobeyDaniel,et al.  Sequential patterns in information systems development , 1996 .

[7]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation , 1988 .

[8]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  The Process and Product of System Design , 1978 .

[9]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[10]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[11]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Control, causality and information system requirements , 1979 .

[12]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Sequential patterns in information systems development: an application of a social process model , 1996, TOIS.

[13]  John C. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Design. , 1980 .

[14]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[15]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Inside a software design team: knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration , 1993, CACM.

[18]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[19]  Livia Polanyi,et al.  Telling the American Story: A Structural and Cultural Analysis of Conversational Storytelling , 1985 .

[20]  J. Walsh.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane , 1995 .

[21]  M. Heng,et al.  Organisational champions of IT innovation , 1999 .

[22]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[23]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[24]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[25]  Gail Salaway,et al.  An Organizational Learning Approach to Information Systems Development , 1987, MIS Q..

[26]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[27]  Robert M. Mason,et al.  The Role of Metaphors in Strategic Information Systems Planning , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  A reappraisal of structured analysis: design in an organizational context , 1993, TOIS.

[29]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Success of Customer-Oriented Strategic Systems , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  D. Robey,et al.  Software stories: three cultural perspectives on the organizational practices of software development , 1999 .

[31]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[32]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[33]  J. Bartunek,et al.  First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach , 1987 .

[34]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Communication and Cognition in Appraisal: A Tale of Two Paradigms , 1989 .

[35]  Samar Mouakket,et al.  Varieties of Political Process During Systems Development , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Mis problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective , 1977 .

[37]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[38]  Angela Lin,et al.  Framing implementation management , 2000, ICIS.

[39]  John H. Miller,et al.  Adapting to Unfamiliar Environmental Events: a Look at the Evolution of Interpretation and its Role in Strategic Change , 1998 .

[40]  William H. Glick,et al.  Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective Event Histories and Periodic Assessments , 1990 .

[41]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[43]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[44]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[45]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1986 POWER OVER USERS : ITS EXERCISE BY SYSTEM PROFESSIONALS , 2017 .

[46]  Michael Newman,et al.  User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case Study , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  H. Thomas,et al.  Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers Revisited , 1989 .

[48]  C. Fiol.  Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. , 1994 .

[49]  J. Bartunek.  Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order , 1984 .

[50]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation , 2001 .

[51]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Method and metaphor in organizational analysis , 1992 .

[52]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[54]  B. Turner,et al.  Grounded Theory and Organizational Research , 1986 .

[55]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[56]  Andrew D. Brown.  Narrative, Politics and Legitimacy in an IT Implimentation , 1998 .

[57]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[58]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[59]  C. R. Franz,et al.  Group process and conflict in system development , 1989 .

[60]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[61]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[62]  Thierry C. Pauchant,et al.  Triggers, templates and twitches in the tracking of emerging strategic issues , 1988 .

[63]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[64]  Elizabeth Davidson,et al.  What's in a name? exploring the metaphysical implications of data warehousing in concept and practice , 1999 .

[65]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  The effect of a priori views on the social implications of computing: the case of office automation , 1986, CSUR.

[66]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..