Percentile values for determining maximum endurance times for static muscular work

Abstract The maximum endurance time (MET) is a key parameter for the ergonomic evaluation of static work. The aim of this study is to offer practitioners MET values in relation to the %MVC (percentage of maximum voluntary contraction) that take into account the results of several studies published on MET. Twenty four published MET models were combined to extract MET percentile values that reflect the interindividual variability and differences among the experimental methods used to develop the models. The MET differences by muscle group are also verified. The results of this study show that, (1) there is a significant difference between the MET values for the back/hip and the MET values for the upper limbs, for a same %MVC value; (2) the model-generated MET values follow a lognormal distribution. A summary table is presented showing the most frequently used percentile values (5th, 10th and 15th percentiles) of the MET corresponding to a range of %MVC values. The data from this paper allow engineers and ergonomics practitioners to design workstations that can accommodate a desired proportion of the worker population, i.e., designs that are not restricted only to the 50th percentile. Relevance to industry Static and intermittent static muscular work is a known risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Estimation of MET to accommodate a percentage of the worker population is a necessary step in determining appropriate work-rest regimens for static muscular work in industrial settings.

[1]  Jan Dul,et al.  Recommended maximum holding times for prevention of discomfort of static standing postures , 1997 .

[2]  M Hagberg,et al.  Muscular endurance and surface electromyogram in isometric and dynamic exercise. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[3]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[4]  W Rohmert,et al.  Problems of determination of rest allowances Part 2: determining rest allowances in different human tasks. , 1973, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  R Ortengren,et al.  Endurance time, pain and resumption in passive loading of the elbow joint , 2000, Ergonomics.

[6]  M Wangenheim,et al.  A study stressing the need for a static postural force model for work analysis. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[7]  A. Garg,et al.  The Strain Index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. , 1995, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[8]  B Jonsson,et al.  Endurance limit of force in long-term intermittent static contractions. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  J Winkel,et al.  Can occupational guidelines for work-rest schedules be based on endurance time data? , 1992, Ergonomics.

[10]  H. Monod,et al.  THE WORK CAPACITY OF A SYNERGIC MUSCULAR GROUP , 1965 .

[11]  D. W. Grieve.  BookThe ergonomics of working postures: Models, methods and cases: N. Corlett, J. Wilson and I. Manineca (Eds) Taylor and Francis, London, 1986, ISBN 0 85066 338 5, pp 429 + ix, £42 , 1987 .

[12]  Shrawan Kumar,et al.  Computer applications in ergonomics, occupational safety and health: edited by Markku Mattila and Waldemar Karwowski. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Ergonomics and Safety, Tampere, Finland, 18–20 May, 1992. Elsevier Science B.V. (North-Holland), Amsterdam, The Netherla , 1995 .

[13]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Prediction of shoulder flexion endurance from personal factors , 1999 .

[14]  Rolf H. Westgaard.  Surface EMG Recordings as a Risk Assessment Tool for Musculoskeletal Disorders , 2000 .

[15]  Anil Mital,et al.  The ergonomics of working postures: by Nigel Corlett, John Wilson and Ilija Manenica (Eds.), Taylor & Francis, Ltd., London and Philadelphia, 1986, ISBN 0-85066-338-5, 429 pages including references and subject index. , 1988 .

[16]  熊本 水頼,et al.  Neural and mechanical control of movement , 1984 .

[17]  H Monod,et al.  Fatigue induced by static work. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[18]  B Gerdle,et al.  Fatigue in the shoulder muscles during static work at two different torque levels. , 1993, Clinical physiology.

[19]  K Iwanaga,et al.  Endurance time and fatigue in static contractions. , 1984, Journal of human ergology.

[20]  Kurt Jørgensen,et al.  Electromyography and fatigue during prolonged, low-level static contractions , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[21]  N Milner.  Modelling fatigue and recovery in static postural exercise. , 1986, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[23]  A D Price,et al.  Calculating relaxation allowances for construction operatives - part 2: local muscle fatigue. , 1990, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  J. H. van Dieen,et al.  The use of the relation between relative force and endurance time , 1994 .

[25]  K. Henriksson,et al.  Isometric muscle strength and muscular endurance in normal persons aged between 17 and 70 years. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  W. Rohmert.  Ermittlung von Erholungspausen für statische Arbeit des Menschen , 1960, Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie.

[27]  A. Garg,et al.  The effect of maximum voluntary contraction on endurance times for the shoulder girdle , 2002 .