Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.

Do Ss compare multidigit numbers digit by digit (symbolic model) or do they compute the whole magnitude of the numbers before comparing them (holistic model)? In 4 experiments of timed 2-digit number comparisons with a fixed standard, the findings of Hinrichs, Yurko, and Hu (1981) were extended with French Ss. Reaction times (RTs) decreased with target-standard distance, with discontinuities at the boundaries of the standard's decade appearing only with standards 55 and 66 but not with 65. The data are compatible with the holistic model. A symbolic interference model that posits the simultaneous comparison of decades and units can also account for the results. To separate the 2 models, the decades and units digits of target numbers were presented asynchronously in Experiment 4. Contrary to the prediction of the interference model, presenting the units before the decades did not change the influence of units on RTs. Pros and cons of the holistic model are discussed.

[1]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  F. Restle.  Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[3]  Donald G. Jamieson,et al.  Relational judgments with remembered stimuli , 1975 .

[4]  S. J. Rule.  Equal discriminability scale of number. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Parkman,et al.  Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  K. Holyoak.  The form of analog size information in memory , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  S Dehaene,et al.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Positional discriminability in linear orderings , 1978 .

[9]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Category and Continuum in Mental Comparisons. , 1977 .

[10]  W. Banks,et al.  Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits. , 1976 .

[11]  M. Cook,et al.  The Power Law as a Special Case of Fechner's Law , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  D. W. Curtis,et al.  Direct quantitative judgments of sums and a two-stage model for psychophysical judgments , 1969 .

[13]  Donald McEwen Johnson,et al.  Confidence and speed in the two-category judgment , 1939 .

[14]  S. Parker,et al.  A scale for the psychological magnitude of number , 1974 .

[15]  David F. Marks,et al.  Relative judgment: A phenomenon and a theory , 1972 .

[16]  Marion M. Root,et al.  Semantic congruity effects in judgments of loudness , 1979 .

[17]  J. Hinrichs,et al.  Place information in multidigit number comparison , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[18]  G. Ekman,et al.  Note on Subjective Scales of Number , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  William P. Banks,et al.  The apparent magnitude of number scaled by random production , 1974 .

[20]  A. T. Welford,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SENSORY-MOTOR PERFORMANCE : SURVEY AND REAPPRAISAL OF TWELVE YEARS' PROGRESS , 1960 .

[21]  R. Moyer.  Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics , 1973 .

[22]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Processing numerical information: A choice time analysis , 1971 .

[23]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Children's Judgments of Numerical Inequality. , 1977 .

[24]  Thomas L. Harrington,et al.  A test of a two-stage model of magnitude judgment , 1968 .

[25]  James V. Hinrichs,et al.  Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. , 1981 .

[26]  S. Poltrock,et al.  A random walk model of digit comparison , 1989 .

[27]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[28]  Steven E. Poltrock,et al.  Comparative judgments of multidigit numbers. , 1984 .